Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
A comparative analysis of intraocular lens power calculation methods after myopic excimer laser surgery
1Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Purpose:
To compare the accuracy and predictability of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation methods in eyes after myopic excimer laser surgery.
Methods:
Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation outcomes in 37 eyes of 37 patients with prior LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy were documented (amount of correction=-6.92+/-3.12 diopters (D), range: -2.00 to -13.00 D). The theoretical IOL power that would have resulted in emmetropia was calculated (IOLemme). Using the clinical history keratometry and biometry, the IOL power was calculated using the following methods: Sanders, Retzlaff, Kraff (SRK)-T, SRK-T Double-K (DK), Holladay 1 DK, Hoffer Q DK, Holladay 2 DK, Feiz-Mannis, and Ladas-Stark corneal bypass. The calculated IOL power was compared to IOLemme and used to determine the mean error and mean absolute error of refractive outcome for each eye.
Results:
The calculated IOL power using the SRK-T, Feiz-Mannis, and Holladay 1 DK methods were significantly different from IOLemme. The lowest mean absolute error was achieved using the Hoffer Q DK method (0.75+/-0.52 D), Holladay 2 DK (0.75+/-0.62 D), SRK-T DK (0.76+/-0.60 D), and Ladas-Stark (0.83+/-63 D). With the SRK-T DK method, 51.4% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia and 67.6% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D. The Holladay 2 DK method had the highest percentage (81.1%) of eyes within +/-1.00 D and 45.9% within +/-0.50 D.
Conclusions:
The refractive results of IOL implantation using the same biometry data in eyes after LASIK can vary markedly. The SRK-T DK, Hoffer Q DK, and Holladay 2 DK methods resulted in the highest accuracy.
