Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adaptive control of event integration.

Elkan G Akyürek1, Paolo Toffanin, Bernhard Hommel

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom. akyurek@psy.lmu.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|May 29, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Theta band activity during event-file retrieval is influenced by stimulus salience in the preceding action episode.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Feature- and space-based interference with functionally active and passive items in working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Altered neural oscillatory dynamics underlie reduced anticipatory schema use during event segmentation in adolescents with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum disorder.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2026
Same author

Sustained alpha oscillations serve attentional prioritization in working memory, not maintenance.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

How the influence of cingulate-lingual interactions on event segmentation changes from early to late adolescence.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Negative Feedback Does Not Reverse Observationally Acquired Binding and Retrieval Effects: A Failed Replication.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

People can control their attentional episode duration. Expecting more processing time increases target order confusion, suggesting rapid adaptation of attentional integration windows.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Identifying targets in rapid visual streams is easier at Lag 1.
  • This phenomenon is linked to integrating targets into single attentional episodes.
  • Order confusion often occurs, suggesting limitations in temporal processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the controllability of temporal integration windows in attention.
  • To examine how expectations about processing time influence target integration and order perception.

Main Methods:

  • Participants identified two targets in a rapid visual stream.
  • Expectations regarding available processing time were manipulated (between- and within-subjects).
  • The frequency of target order confusions at Lag 1 was measured.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Increased expectation of processing time led to more target order confusions at Lag 1.
  • This effect was observed in both between-subjects and trial-to-trial (within-subjects) manipulations.
  • Findings indicate that attentional integration windows can be actively and rapidly adjusted.

Conclusions:

  • Attentional integration windows are not fixed but can be dynamically controlled.
  • Expectations about temporal resources play a crucial role in shaping attentional episodes.
  • The cognitive system can adapt its temporal processing strategies quickly based on contextual cues.