Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
Molecular testing for somatic mutations in common cancers: the views of UK oncologists
S Wordsworth1, J Buchanan, I Papanicolas
1Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sarah.wordsworth@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Background:
Somatic mutations are important determinants of cancer behaviour and response to therapy. However, molecular testing in this context has a relatively low profile within the clinical community, despite publicity surrounding targeted therapies such as Herceptin.
Aims:
As the testing process affects many stakeholders, especially oncologists, this paper examines current test request patterns and views of such testing.
Methods:
A postal questionnaire was mailed to 582 UK oncologists and haematologists, achieving a 20% response rate.
Results:
The survey revealed that immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridisation are the most commonly requested tests (used by 70% and 55% of respondents, respectively), especially for breast cancer. Availability of suitable treatment options is the main factor influencing the decision to test (selected by 62% of respondents). Respondents were generally positive about future demand for immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridisation, microarray analysis and DNA-based tests, but uncertain about the prospects for microsatellite instability and ploidy testing.
Conclusions:
Overall, respondents thought that somatic mutation testing could have a significant and positive effect on oncology and haematology departments and patient care, especially with better treatment and tumour classification. However, lack of supportive scientific evidence and funding were considered key barriers to widespread testing. Further research is clearly required on both the resource implications of this increase in demand and the best model of service delivery to ensure the most efficient use of health service resources.
Insights
Somatic mutation testing shows promise for improving cancer care, but widespread adoption faces barriers. Oncologists commonly use immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization, driven by available treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- Somatic mutations significantly influence cancer behavior and treatment response.
- Molecular testing for somatic mutations is underutilized in clinical practice despite targeted therapy advancements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate current patterns and perceptions of somatic mutation testing among UK oncologists and hematologists.
- To understand factors influencing test requests and future demand.
Main Methods:
- A postal questionnaire was distributed to 582 UK oncologists and hematologists.
- A 20% response rate was achieved, providing insights into current practices.
Main Results:
- Immunohistochemistry (70%) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (55%) are the most frequent tests, particularly for breast cancer.
- Treatment availability is the primary driver for testing decisions (62%).
- Positive outlook for future demand in immunohistochemistry, FISH, microarray, and DNA tests, with uncertainty for microsatellite instability and ploidy testing.
Conclusions:
- Somatic mutation testing is perceived to positively impact oncology, hematology, and patient care through improved classification and treatment.
- Key barriers include insufficient scientific evidence and funding.
- Further research is needed on service delivery models and resource implications to support increased demand.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Cancer
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
