Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MASCAF: A Cable Model Fitting Pipeline for Topologically Complex Surface Meshes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A flexible cross-correlation based population model of interaural time difference coding in barn owl's midbrain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Neural Responses Underlying Interaural Time Difference Discrimination as a Function of Sensory Reliability in the Barn Owl.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Neural responses underlying ITD discrimination as a function of sensory reliability in the barn owl.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Auditory Competition and Stimulus Selection across Spatial Locations from Midbrain to Forebrain in Barn Owls.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Single trial Bayesian inference by population vector readout in the barn owl's sound localization system.

PloS one·2024
Same journal

Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

When "Noise" Isn't Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS).

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

From discovery to translation: charting a course for the <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Neuromodulatory Strategies Overcome Multiple Inevitable Impairments of Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Acute Fentanyl Toxicity:From Opioid-Induced to Hypoxia-Mediated Pathophysiology.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Variability reduction in interaural time difference tuning in the barn owl.

Brian J Fischer1, Masakazu Konishi

  • 1Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Mail code 216-76, 1200 E. California, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. fischerb@caltech.edu

Journal of Neurophysiology
|May 30, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Barn owls locate sounds by measuring the tiny time delay between when a sound reaches each ear. This study examines how the owl's brain refines this signal to accurately pinpoint sound sources, finding that specific midbrain neurons can identify these delays from a single sound burst.

Keywords:
Auditory NeuroscienceNeural CodingTemporal ProcessingMidbrain Circuits

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings
09:32

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

Enhancing an Avian Sound Recognition Model&#39;s Detection Precision via Logistic Regression of Large Acoustic Datasets: A Case Study of the European Robin (Erithacus rubecula)
10:55

Enhancing an Avian Sound Recognition Model's Detection Precision via Logistic Regression of Large Acoustic Datasets: A Case Study of the European Robin (Erithacus rubecula)

Published on: April 12, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings
09:32

Evaluation of Auditory Brainstem Response in Chicken Hatchlings

Published on: April 1, 2022

Enhancing an Avian Sound Recognition Model&#39;s Detection Precision via Logistic Regression of Large Acoustic Datasets: A Case Study of the European Robin (Erithacus rubecula)
10:55

Enhancing an Avian Sound Recognition Model's Detection Precision via Logistic Regression of Large Acoustic Datasets: A Case Study of the European Robin (Erithacus rubecula)

Published on: April 12, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Neurobiology of interaural time difference processing
  • Systems neuroscience and sensory perception

Background:

Prior research has shown that owls rely on timing disparities between ears to determine horizontal sound locations. These temporal cues are processed through specialized neural circuits involving delay lines and coincidence detectors. While the initial computation occurs in the nucleus laminaris, the downstream refinement of these signals remains poorly understood. No prior work had resolved whether noise reduction occurs before reaching the inferior colliculus. That uncertainty drove this investigation into the intermediate processing stages of the auditory pathway. Scientists previously assumed that signal averaging was required across all levels of the system. This gap motivated a closer look at the anterior dorsal lateral lemniscal nucleus. The current study addresses how these intermediate neurons handle temporal information compared to their targets.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms underlying temporal signal refinement in the barn owl auditory system. Researchers sought to determine if the anterior part of the dorsal lateral lemniscal nucleus contributes to the reduction of response variability. This investigation addressed the uncertainty regarding where noise reduction first emerges in the ascending auditory pathway. The study examined whether the lemniscal nucleus possesses the ability to detect timing delays from single stimulus bursts. This goal was motivated by the need to understand how the brain achieves high-precision sound localization. Scientists aimed to compare the temporal tuning of lemniscal neurons with those in the nucleus laminaris and the inferior colliculus. The research sought to clarify if the inferior colliculus inherits its noise-reduction properties from earlier processing stages. This work provides a framework for understanding the hierarchical organization of temporal information in the avian midbrain.

Main Methods:

The review approach involved analyzing extracellular neural activity within the midbrain of anesthetized avian subjects. Researchers systematically presented auditory stimuli with varying temporal offsets to elicit neuronal responses. They compared the firing patterns of neurons located in the lemniscal nucleus against those in the nucleus laminaris. The team quantified response variability by evaluating how consistently neurons fired at their preferred timing offsets. Data collection focused on determining if single-burst responses could reliably indicate sound location. This methodology allowed for a direct assessment of temporal precision across different anatomical stations. The investigators utilized standard electrophysiological techniques to isolate individual cellular signals. This design ensured that the temporal characteristics of the lemniscal output were accurately captured and compared to downstream collicular targets.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that LLDa neurons possess the capacity to detect preferred timing delays during a single stimulus burst. This ability mirrors the performance previously attributed only to the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. The data show that signal variability is significantly reduced at the lemniscal level compared to the nucleus laminaris. These neurons successfully extract temporal information without the need for averaging across multiple stimulus presentations. The results suggest that the lemniscal nucleus performs a substantial portion of the noise-reduction process. This finding challenges the assumption that temporal refinement is restricted to the final stages of the auditory pathway. The observed precision in LLDa neurons provides a mechanism for the rapid sound localization capabilities of the barn owl. This evidence supports the hypothesis that the inferior colliculus inherits its high-fidelity temporal tuning from the lemniscal pathway.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that the anterior dorsal lateral lemniscal nucleus serves as a site for temporal signal refinement. These neurons demonstrate an ability to detect preferred timing delays within a single stimulus burst. This capacity suggests that the inferior colliculus receives already processed, high-fidelity information from the lemniscal pathway. The findings imply that noise reduction is not exclusive to the highest levels of the midbrain. Researchers suggest that this transformation occurs earlier in the auditory hierarchy than previously documented. The study supports the model that signal reliability increases progressively along the ascending pathway. These observations clarify the functional role of the lemniscal nucleus in sound localization. Future investigations might explore the synaptic mechanisms underlying this rapid temporal detection.

The researchers propose that LLDa neurons achieve high signal reliability by detecting preferred timing delays within a single stimulus burst, rather than requiring multiple presentations. This mechanism allows the owl to pinpoint sound sources rapidly, contrasting with the slower, averaged response observed in the nucleus laminaris.

The anterior part of the dorsal lateral lemniscal nucleus acts as a relay station between the nucleus laminaris and the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus. It processes temporal cues before they reach the midbrain core, facilitating the inheritance of noise-reduction properties by downstream targets.

The authors suggest that the LLDa is necessary for the inheritance of noise reduction by the ICcc. Without this intermediate processing, the midbrain would likely require multiple stimulus presentations to achieve the same level of localization accuracy observed in the intact system.

Extracellular recordings provided the primary data for this study. These measurements allowed the researchers to capture the firing patterns of individual neurons in response to specific timing delays, enabling a direct comparison between the lemniscal and collicular processing stages.

The study measured the selectivity of neurons for specific timing delays. It compared the response variability of LLDa neurons to those in the nucleus laminaris, demonstrating that LLDa neurons exhibit reduced variability during single stimulus bursts.

The authors claim that their findings raise the possibility that the inferior colliculus inherits its noise-reduction property from the LLDa. This suggests a hierarchical model of auditory processing where signal refinement occurs sequentially across multiple brain regions.