Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Active learning: learning a motor skill without a coach.

Vincent S Huang1, Reza Shadmehr, Jörn Diedrichsen

  • 1Laboratory for Computational Motor Control, Department of Biomedical Engineering, John Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. vh2181@columbia.edu

Journal of Neurophysiology
|May 30, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Precision Functional Parcellation of the Human Cortex via Rest-Task fMRI Fusion.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Online planning of sequential actions.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Reading ability in both deaf and hearing adults is linked to neural representations of abstract phonology derived from visual speech.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Cerebellar growth is associated with domain-specific cerebral maturation and socio-linguistic behavior.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Sequence preparation is not always associated with a reaction time cost.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

How does the cerebellum contribute to cognitive functions?

PLoS biology·2026
Same journal

Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

When "Noise" Isn't Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS).

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

From discovery to translation: charting a course for the <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Neuromodulatory Strategies Overcome Multiple Inevitable Impairments of Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Acute Fentanyl Toxicity:From Opioid-Induced to Hypoxia-Mediated Pathophysiology.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

People learning new motor skills focus on practicing actions that previously caused errors, leading to better performance. However, this strategy is suboptimal as they don't avoid repeating successful actions, unlike machine learning algorithms.

Area of Science:

  • Motor learning
  • Cognitive science
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Active learning involves self-directed training sequence selection.
  • Understanding human active learning strategies is crucial for optimizing skill acquisition.
  • Current machine learning algorithms for active learning focus on reducing uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the strategies humans use to select training sequences when learning a new motor skill.
  • To compare human learning strategies with those predicted by machine learning algorithms.
  • To identify factors influencing human motor error correction and learning.

Main Methods:

  • Participants learned novel dynamics of a robotic tool through self-selected practice in four directions.
  • Instructions were to choose practice directions to maximize subsequent test performance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Human choices and performance were analyzed and compared to machine learning predictions.

    • Main Results:

    • Human practice choices were strongly influenced by recent motor errors; errors led to immediate repetition of actions.
    • This error-driven repetition strategy correlated with improved performance on test trials.
    • Participants did not avoid repeating successful actions, leading to suboptimal learning and deviating from machine learning predictions.

    Conclusions:

    • Human motor learning strategies are primarily driven by error correction, not uncertainty reduction as in machine learning.
    • Current machine learning models do not fully capture human active learning behavior.
    • Findings suggest potential interventions to improve human motor learning by guiding training sequence selection.