Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Information Processing Approach01:30

Information Processing Approach

The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is also...
Chunking01:12

Chunking

Chunking is a powerful cognitive technique that improves short-term memory retention by organizing information into smaller, more manageable units. The brain, limited by working memory capacity, can more easily process and store information when it is divided into "chunks" rather than presented as discrete, unrelated elements. Chunking is especially useful when dealing with large amounts of information, such as numerical sequences, words, or complex ideas.
The principle behind chunking is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility and acceptability of a rural palliative care intervention for patients with heart failure (RuPAL-HF).

BMC palliative care·2026
Same author

"If I have any problems, I just want to see my [primary care] doctor": perspectives on a proposed collaborative RUral PALliative care intervention (RuPal).

BMC palliative care·2026
Same author

Behavioral Predictors of Adolescent Anxiety During Therapy Dog Interactions Within an Experimental Setting.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Longitudinal idiographic assessment of adolescent-dog relationships and adaptive coping for youth with social anxiety: The Teen & Dog Study protocol.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Genetic, phenotypic, and environmental drivers of local adaptation and climate change-induced maladaptation in a migratory songbird.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

A Multipurpose Microhaplotype Panel for Genetic Analysis of California Chinook Salmon.

Evolutionary applications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Strategy use in mental subtraction determines central executive load.

Loel N Tronsky1, Melissa McManus, Eric C Anderson

  • 1Psychology Department, Albertus Magnus College, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

The American Journal of Psychology
|May 31, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study found that solving subtraction problems relies on working memory, particularly the central executive component. Counting strategies place a higher demand on this component than retrieval strategies.

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
09:48

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Published on: September 11, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention
09:48

Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention

Published on: September 11, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Working memory is crucial for complex cognitive tasks, including mathematical problem-solving.
  • The central executive component of working memory plays a key role in managing cognitive resources.
  • Understanding the interplay between working memory load and strategy use is vital for educational interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between working memory load and strategy selection during subtraction problem-solving.
  • To determine the specific role of the central executive subcomponent in different subtraction strategies.

Main Methods:

  • A dual-task paradigm was employed, requiring participants to solve subtraction problems while concurrently performing secondary tasks.
  • Secondary tasks varied in their demands on the central executive (response selection and input monitoring vs. input monitoring only).
  • Participants' strategy use (retrieval vs. non-retrieval/counting) was monitored during subtraction problem-solving.

Main Results:

  • A task demanding response selection and input monitoring (CRT-R) significantly interfered with subtraction performance compared to an input-monitoring-only task (SRT-R).
  • The CRT-R task showed greater interference when participants employed a non-retrieval (counting) strategy versus a retrieval strategy.
  • These findings indicate differential engagement of the central executive based on strategy use.

Conclusions:

  • The response selection subcomponent of the central executive is engaged during both retrieval and non-retrieval subtraction strategies.
  • Non-retrieval (counting) strategies place a higher load on the central executive's response selection capabilities.
  • This research elucidates the cognitive architecture supporting mathematical problem-solving and strategy implementation.