Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A scientometric review of positive youth development research in China.

Acta psychologica·2026

Same author

Parental Marital Satisfaction and Suicidal Behavior in Preadolescents and Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Positive Youth Development Attributes.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026

Same author

Subjective outcome evaluation of a gifted education program: the Project GIFT in Hong Kong.

BMC psychology·2026

Same author

The Quest for Positive Youth Development Programs in the Post Pandemic Era.

The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·2025

Same author

Mental Health of Young People in the Post-Pandemic Era: Perspective Based on Positive Psychology and Resilience.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2025

Same author

Stress and Coping Strategies of Hong Kong University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Evaluation of project P.A.T.H.S. (Secondary 2 Program) by the program implementers: findings based on the

Daniel T L Shek¹, Rachel C F Sun, Daniel W M Lung

¹Department of Sociology, East China Normal University, Shanghai. danielshek@cuhk.edu.hk

Thescientificworldjournal

|June 3, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Instructors in the Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes (P.A.T.H.S.) initiative reported high satisfaction with the program and their performance. Over 90% found the program beneficial for adolescent participants.

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Area of Science:

Adolescent psychology
Educational program evaluation
Social-emotional learning interventions

Background:

The Positive Adolescent Training through Holistic Social Programmes (P.A.T.H.S.) is a program designed for adolescent development.
The Experimental Implementation Phase involved 49 schools and 8,167 students in Secondary 2.
Assessing program implementer perceptions is crucial for understanding intervention effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate instructor perceptions of the P.A.T.H.S. program during its experimental implementation.
To assess instructors' views on their own performance within the program.
To determine the perceived effectiveness of the P.A.T.H.S. program from the implementer's perspective.

Main Methods:

A Subjective Outcome Evaluation Form (Form B) was administered to 270 instructors post-Tier 1 Program completion.
Consolidated school reports were aggregated to create an overall implementer perception profile.
Data analysis focused on instructor feedback regarding the program, self-performance, and perceived participant benefits.

Main Results:

A high proportion of instructors reported positive perceptions of the P.A.T.H.S. program.
Instructors generally viewed their own performance favorably.
Over 90% of instructors believed the program was helpful to adolescent participants.

Conclusions:

Instructor feedback indicates a positive reception of the P.A.T.H.S. program.
The findings align with previous evaluations based on participant perspectives.
The P.A.T.H.S. program appears to be perceived as effective by its implementers.