Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling01:04

¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling

The probability of having two carbon-13 atoms next to each other is negligible because of the low natural abundance of carbon-13. Consequently, peak splitting due to carbon-carbon spin-spin coupling is not observed in spectra. However, protons up to three sigma bonds away split the carbon signal according to the n+1 rule, resulting in complicated spectra.
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
¹³C NMR: Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer (DEPT)01:20

¹³C NMR: Distortionless Enhancement by Polarization Transfer (DEPT)

When proton-coupled carbon-13 spectra are simplified by a broadband proton decoupling technique, structural information about the coupled protons is lost. Distortionless enhancement by polarization transfer (DEPT) is a technique that provides information on the number of hydrogens attached to each carbon in a molecule. While the DEPT experiment utilizes complex pulse sequences, the pulse delay and flip angle are specifically manipulated. The resulting signals have different phases depending on...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-precision measurement of the <i>W</i> boson mass with the CDF II detector.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

Search for the Exotic Meson X(5568) with the Collider Detector at Fermilab.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Combined Forward-Backward Asymmetry Measurements in Top-Antitop Quark Production at the Tevatron.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Tevatron Combination of Single-Top-Quark Cross Sections and Determination of the Magnitude of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix Element V_{tb}.

Physical review letters·2015
Same author

Search for Resonances Decaying to Top and Bottom Quarks with the CDF Experiment.

Physical review letters·2015
Same author

Search for a standard model Higgs boson produced in association with a top-quark pair and decaying to bottom quarks using a matrix element method.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Studying Soft-matter and Biological Systems over a Wide Length-scale from Nanometer and Micrometer Sizes at the Small-angle Neutron Diffractometer KWS-2
11:27

Studying Soft-matter and Biological Systems over a Wide Length-scale from Nanometer and Micrometer Sizes at the Small-angle Neutron Diffractometer KWS-2

Published on: December 8, 2016

Evidence for D0-D(0) mixing using the CDF II detector.

T Aaltonen1, J Adelman, T Akimoto

  • 1Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan 11529, Rpublic of China.

Physical Review Letters
|June 4, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Researchers observed rare D0 decays, finding evidence of D0-D0bar mixing. This suggests new physics beyond the Standard Model, challenging the no-mixing hypothesis with high statistical significance.

More Related Videos

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers
08:51

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers

Published on: August 18, 2017

Preparing an Isotopically Pure 229Th Ion Beam for Studies of 229mTh
10:42

Preparing an Isotopically Pure 229Th Ion Beam for Studies of 229mTh

Published on: May 3, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Studying Soft-matter and Biological Systems over a Wide Length-scale from Nanometer and Micrometer Sizes at the Small-angle Neutron Diffractometer KWS-2
11:27

Studying Soft-matter and Biological Systems over a Wide Length-scale from Nanometer and Micrometer Sizes at the Small-angle Neutron Diffractometer KWS-2

Published on: December 8, 2016

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers
08:51

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers

Published on: August 18, 2017

Preparing an Isotopically Pure 229Th Ion Beam for Studies of 229mTh
10:42

Preparing an Isotopically Pure 229Th Ion Beam for Studies of 229mTh

Published on: May 3, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Particle Physics
  • High Energy Physics
  • Quantum Mechanics

Background:

  • The Standard Model of particle physics describes fundamental particles and forces.
  • Rare decays of D0 mesons provide a sensitive probe for physics beyond the Standard Model.
  • D0-D0bar mixing, the oscillation between a D0 meson and its antiparticle, is a key phenomenon to study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure the time dependence of the ratio of decay rates for the rare decay D0-->K+pi- to the Cabibbo-favored decay D0-->K-pi+.
  • To determine the D0-D0bar mixing parameters (R_D, y', x'^2).
  • To test the hypothesis of no D0-D0bar mixing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the Collider Detector at Fermilab II (CDF II) at the Fermilab Tevatron.
  • Collected an integrated luminosity of 1.5 fb^-1.
  • Analyzed a signal of 12.7x10^3 D0-->K+pi- decays.

Main Results:

  • Observed a significant signal for the rare decay D0-->K+pi-.
  • Measured the D0-D0bar mixing parameters.
  • Found the data to be inconsistent with the no-mixing hypothesis at a significance of 3.8 standard deviations.

Conclusions:

  • The results provide evidence for D0-D0bar mixing.
  • The findings suggest the presence of new physics beyond the Standard Model.
  • The no-mixing hypothesis is rejected with high statistical significance.