Association between critical care physician management and patient mortality in the intensive care unit
Mitchell M Levy1, John Rapoport, Stanley Lemeshow
1Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. Mitchell_Levy@brown.edu
Insights
Management by critical care physicians in intensive care units (ICUs) was associated with higher hospital mortality rates. Further research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and potential confounding factors in this critical care outcomes study.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) may benefit from specialized care.
- Evidence supporting survival benefits from critical care physicians is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between hospital mortality and management by critical care physicians.
- To analyze outcomes for critically ill adults in U.S. hospitals.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of a large, prospectively collected database.
- Involved 101,832 critically ill adults across 123 ICUs in 100 U.S. hospitals.
- Used random-effects logistic regression, adjusting for illness severity (Simplified Acute Physiology Score) and referral bias (propensity score).
Main Results:
- Patients receiving critical care management (CCM) were sicker and had higher unadjusted mortality rates.
- After adjustments, hospital mortality remained higher for patients managed by critical care physicians.
- The adjusted mortality difference was smaller for sicker patients predicted to receive CCM.
Conclusions:
- Potential residual confounders related to illness severity and selection bias for CCM may exist.
- Hospital mortality odds were higher for ICU patients managed by critical care physicians in this U.S. study.
- Additional research is required to validate these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.
Background:
Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) are thought to gain an added survival benefit from management by critical care physicians, but evidence of this benefit is scant.
Objective:
To examine the association between hospital mortality in critically ill patients and management by critical care physicians.
Design:
Retrospective analysis of a large, prospectively collected database of critically ill patients.
Setting:
123 ICUs in 100 U.S. hospitals.
Patients:
101,832 critically ill adults.
Measurements:
Through use of a random-effects logistic regression, investigators compared hospital mortality between patients cared for entirely by critical care physicians and patients cared for entirely by non-critical care physicians. An expanded Simplified Acute Physiology Score was used to adjust for severity of illness, and a propensity score was used to adjust for differences in the probability of selective referral of patients to critical care physicians.
Results:
Patients who received critical care management (CCM) were generally sicker, received more procedures, and had higher hospital mortality rates than those who did not receive CCM. After adjustment for severity of illness and propensity score, hospital mortality rates were higher for patients who received CCM than for those who did not. The difference in adjusted hospital mortality rates was less for patients who were sicker and who were predicted by propensity score to receive CCM.
Limitation:
Residual confounders for illness severity and selection biases for CCM might exist that were inadequately assessed or recognized.
Conclusion:
In a large sample of ICU patients in the United States, the odds of hospital mortality were higher for patients managed by critical care physicians than those who were not. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate these results and clarify the mechanisms by which they might occur.
More Related Videos
09:36Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
