Comparison of intramedullary nailing to plating for both-bone forearm fractures in older children

Keith R Reinhardt1, David S Feldman, Daniel W Green

  • 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA. reinhardtk@hss.edu

Insights

Intramedullary nailing and plating offer similar outcomes for forearm fractures in children aged 10-16. Nailing is quicker and equally effective for these pediatric fractures.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Trauma Surgery

Background:

  • Operative fixation of forearm fractures in children (10-16 years) is debated.
  • Optimal fixation methods for pediatric forearm fractures require comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Compare radiographic and functional outcomes of intramedullary nailing versus plating for forearm fractures in children aged 10-16.
  • Evaluate fracture union, forearm rotation, radial bow restoration, and complication rates.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective comparative study of 31 patients with midshaft radius and ulna fractures.
  • Patients divided into intramedullary nailing (19) and plating (12) groups.
  • Comparison of perioperative data and patient outcomes at 3 and 6 months, and latest follow-up.

Main Results:

  • Nailing group had significantly shorter surgery duration and tourniquet time.
  • No significant differences in fracture union at 3 or 6 months between groups.
  • Similar radial bow magnitude and forearm rotation; radial bow location differed in the nailing group.
  • Comparable complication rates between nailing and plating groups.

Conclusions:

  • Intramedullary nailing is an equally effective fixation method compared to plating for length-stable forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients (10-16 years).
  • Nailing is a viable and preferred treatment option due to similar functional and radiographic outcomes.
  • Both methods achieve normal radial bow magnitude and restore forearm rotation.
Abstract