Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

09:47
Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints
Published on: May 1, 2016
Batesian mimicry: can a leopard change its spots--and get them back?
1Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK. mathieu.joron@ed.ac.uk
Current Biology : CB
|June 5, 2008
Summary
Batesian mimics, species that resemble dangerous ones, can survive without their models nearby. However, they may need different survival tactics and physical traits when models are absent.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Ecology
- Behavioral Ecology
Background:
- Batesian mimicry is an evolutionary strategy where a harmless species mimics a harmful one.
- The survival of mimics is often thought to depend on the proximity of their toxic models.
- Recent research challenges this assumption, exploring mimic survival in model-free environments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the survival capabilities of Batesian mimics when they are outside the geographic or ecological range of their defended models.
- To identify alternative survival strategies and morphological adaptations that may be favored in the absence of model-based protection.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of two recent studies on Batesian mimicry.
- Review of ecological and morphological data related to mimic-model interactions and independent survival.
- Examination of factors influencing mimic survival in varying ecological contexts.
Main Results:
- Evidence suggests that Batesian mimics can persist even when their noxious models are not present.
- The absence of models appears to favor the evolution of alternative defensive strategies or distinct physical characteristics in mimics.
- Mimicry dynamics are more complex than previously assumed, with environmental factors playing a significant role.
Conclusions:
- Undefended mimics possess a greater capacity for survival beyond the range of their models than previously recognized.
- Ecological context and selective pressures outside the mimic-model interaction drive the evolution of diverse survival mechanisms.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the plasticity and adaptive potential of mimicry systems.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Nonconscious Mimicry
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Epistasis
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
Fixed Action Patterns
A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
Mate Choice
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
Complementation Tests
A complementation test is a simple cross to identify whether the two mutations are located on the same gene or different genes. It was first performed by Edward Lewis in the 1940s while working on fruit flies. He developed the test to identify the location and arrangement of different mutations on chromosomes.
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...

