Reliability of a magnetic resonance imaging-based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Chronic Spinal Cord Compression
Published on: May 7, 2019
Masashi Miyazaki1, Soon Woo Hong, Seung Hwan Yoon
1UCLA Comprehensive Spine Center, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.
Study Design:
This was a radiographic reliability study of a novel grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration.
Objectives:
This study aimed to develop and test the reliability of a reproducible grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration on the basis of the routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Summary Of Background Data:
Cervical disc degeneration is common after middle age, and the morphology of cervical disc degenerative disease has often been studied using MRI. There are few specific MRI-based grading systems for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration despite the clinical importance of this problem. This study proposes a novel reproducible grading system for cervical disc degeneration and demonstrates the reliability of this classification scheme.
Methods:
A grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration was developed based on relevant previous literature. MRI grading of 300 cervical intervertebral discs using T2-weighted sagittal images was performed by 4 spinal surgeons (observers) in a blinded fashion. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were assessed by calculating kappa statistics.
Results:
Grade I degeneration was observed in 27 discs (9.0%); grade II, in 56 (18.7%); grade III, in 124 (41.3%); grade IV, in 67 (22.3%); and grade V, in 26 (8.7%) discs. Kappa coefficients for intraobserver and interobserver agreements ranged from substantial to excellent (intraobserver, 0.907 to 0.950 and interobserver, 0.730 to 0.826). Complete agreement was obtained, on an average, in 72.1% of the discs. A difference of 1, 2, and 3 grades was observed in 22.4%, 3.3%, and 0.2% discs, respectively.
Conclusions:
This grading system is comprehensive and easily applicable with sufficient reproducibility. It can be used as a common nomenclature for research and discussions.
Related Concept Videos
Degenerative Disc Disease I: Introduction
Degenerative Disc Disease ll: Pathophysiology
Herniated Intervertebral Disc l: Introduction
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI