Intima-media thickness and carotid resistive index: progression over 6 years and predictive value for cardiovascular
H Uthoff1, D Staub, A Meyerhans
1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Angiology, Cantonal Hospital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
Insights
Intima-media thickness (IMT) and resistive index (RI) predict cardiovascular events. IMT progression, unlike RI, indicates worsening atherosclerosis, especially after an event, making it valuable for risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Intima-media thickness (IMT) and resistive index (RI) are established cardiovascular risk predictors.
- Long-term predictive values and progression patterns of IMT and RI require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term predictive value of IMT of the common carotid artery and RI of the internal carotid artery for cardiovascular events.
- To assess the progression of IMT and RI over time and their relationship with cardiovascular risk and events.
Main Methods:
- 145 patients with cardiovascular risk factors or atherosclerosis underwent duplex sonography for IMT and RI measurements at baseline, 36, and 74 months.
- Cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke) were recorded during follow-up.
- Statistical analyses, including log-rank analysis, were used to assess the relationship between IMT, RI, their progression, and cardiovascular events.
Main Results:
- Both baseline IMT and RI were continuous predictors of cardiovascular events (p=0.011 and p=0.006, respectively).
- IMT progression was significantly higher in patients with high atherosclerotic burden (SMART score >7) and those who experienced a cardiovascular event (p<0.002 and p<0.001, respectively).
- No significant progression of RI was detected in any patient group during the follow-up period.
Conclusions:
- IMT and RI confirm their long-term predictive value for cardiovascular events.
- IMT demonstrates progression over six years, particularly in patients experiencing cardiovascular events, supporting its use for risk stratification and monitoring.
- RI progression could not be reliably measured, limiting its utility for monitoring atherosclerosis progression; further research is needed on drug therapy effects on RI.
Purpose:
Intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery and the resistive index (RI) of the internal carotid artery correlate with the degree of atherosclerosis and are predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Limited or no data are available about long-term predictive values and the progression of the two markers themselves.
Materials And Methods:
145 patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor or clinically manifest atherosclerosis were included. At enrollment and after 36 and 74 months, duplex sonographic measurements of IMT CCA and RI ICA were performed. During follow-up, the occurrence of cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke) was assessed.
Results:
At baseline, IMT was 0.79 +/- 0.16 mm and RI 0.66 +/- 0.08. Log-rank analysis showed a continuous increase in the risk of a cardiovascular event with an increasing range of IMT (p = 0.011) and RI (p = 0.006). IMT progression in patients with low versus high atherosclerotic burden (as defined by SMART score < or =7 points and > 7 points) differs significantly (32 +/- 83 microm versus 95 +/- 125 microm; p < 0.002). IMT progression was even more pronounced in patients suffering a cardiovascular event (141 +/- 105 microm versus 54 +/- 111 microm; p < 0.001). No significant RI ICA progression could be detected during follow-up in any group (patients with low vs. high atherosclerotic burden 0.00 +/- 0.06 versus 0.00 +/- 0.04; p = n. s.; patients with vs. without cardiovascular event 0.00 +/- 0.05 versus 0.01 +/- 0.03; p = n. s.).
Conclusion:
Our results confirm the predictive value for cardiovascular events of RI and IMT in long-term follow-up. In contrast to RI, IMT increases over six years, above all in patients suffering a cardiovascular event. The results suggest that IMT is suitable for cardiovascular risk prediction as well as for progression measurements, while RI cannot be recommended for progression measurements. The effect of drug therapy on RI needs further clarification.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management

