The use of section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983: an audit
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Poornima Gangaram1, Palanivelu S Kumar
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull. poornima1@doctors.org.uk
Abstract:
Section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) deals with the compulsory detainment of a mentally unwell inpatient in hospital for a period of 72 hours. During this time the Responsible Medical Officer (RMO) must review the patient and either increase the duration of compulsory stay by converting it to a section 2/section 3, or discharge the patient if appropriate or make the patient's stay informal. Section 5(2) can be implemented by either the RMO or his deputy (duty doctor). An audit of the use of section 5(2) MHA within a psychiatric hospital was carried out between October 2000 and September 2001. The medical case notes of those patients identified were used to obtain data on patient demographics, date of implementation of section 5(2), date of reassessment after section 5(2) and outcome of the assessment. We also looked at reasons for the use of section 5(2), and the documentation standards. Section 5(2) was implemented 55 times during this period. Nearly 83% of cases were in the age group 21 to 60 years. Most were implemented out of working hours. Seventy-five per cent of the patients were assessed within the next 48 hours by the RMO. Forty-one per cent of the patients who were placed under 5(2) were re-graded to informal, 32% were put under section 3 of MHA and 27% placed under section 2 of MHA. When compared with similar studies, this study showed a higher conversion rate from section 5(2) to section 2/3 suggesting that section 5(2) may have been used appropriately (Table I). Many current areas of practice do not meet with standards recommended by the Code of Practice as suggested in a cross sectional survey on the use of section 5(2) (Jacob and Freer, 2005). Higher conversion rates of section 5(2) to a further section may indicate appropriate use of Section 5(2), and also increasing psychiatric inpatient morbidity.
Insights
This study audited the use of Section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983, finding higher conversion rates to other sections suggest appropriate use. The audit also highlighted areas for improvement in documentation standards for compulsory detainment.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Mental Health Law
- Clinical Audit
Background:
- Section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 allows for 72-hour compulsory detainment of psychiatric inpatients.
- This period allows Responsible Medical Officers (RMOs) to assess patients for further treatment or discharge.
- The use and documentation of Section 5(2) require regular auditing to ensure appropriate application and adherence to standards.
Purpose of the Study:
- To audit the implementation and outcomes of Section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 in a psychiatric hospital.
- To assess patient demographics, reasons for use, reassessment timeliness, and outcomes following Section 5(2) implementation.
- To evaluate documentation standards against the Code of Practice recommendations.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective audit of medical case notes for patients detained under Section 5(2) between October 2000 and September 2001.
- Data collection included patient demographics, dates of Section 5(2) implementation and reassessment, and the final outcome.
- Analysis of reasons for Section 5(2) use and adherence to documentation standards.
Main Results:
- Section 5(2) was implemented 55 times, predominantly in patients aged 21-60 and often outside standard working hours.
- 75% of patients were reassessed by an RMO within 48 hours.
- Outcomes included 41% re-graded to informal status, 32% placed under Section 3, and 27% under Section 2 of the MHA.
Conclusions:
- The study observed a higher conversion rate from Section 5(2) to Sections 2 or 3 compared to similar studies, suggesting appropriate utilization.
- Implementation outside working hours and potential documentation deficiencies were noted, indicating areas for practice improvement.
- Findings suggest Section 5(2) may be effectively used to manage acute inpatient psychiatric situations, reflecting increasing inpatient morbidity.
Related Concept Videos
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I

