Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient and public involvement in pragmatic trials: online survey of corresponding authors of published trials.

CMAJ open·2023
Same author

Implementation of the Canadian syncope pathway: a pilot non-randomized stepped wedge trial.

CJEM·2023
Same author

Does it decay? Obtaining decaying correlation parameter values from previously analysed cluster randomised trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2023
Same author

Comparison of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes between induction and expectant management among women with gestational diabetes mellitus at term pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2023
Same author

Evaluating the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to reduce low-value care in adults hospitalized following trauma: a protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.

Implementation science : IS·2023
Same author

A re-analysis of 150 women's health trials to investigate how the Bayesian approach may offer a solution to the misinterpretation of statistical findings.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.

Monica Taljaard1, Allan Donner, Neil Klar

  • 1Ottawa Health Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. mtaljaard@ohri.ca <mtaljaard@ohri.ca>

Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
|June 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Cluster randomized trials with missing data benefit from careful imputation. While cluster mean imputation is simple and valid, pooling data across clusters, especially accounting for intracluster correlation, often provides more powerful results for intervention effects.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are increasingly used in health promotion and services research, randomly assigning social units (e.g., schools, practices) to interventions.
  • Attrition, leading to missing outcome data, is common in CRTs, necessitating robust imputation strategies for accurate analysis.
  • Standard imputation methods may not adequately address the complexities of missing data within the clustered structure of CRTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of five different imputation strategies for continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials with missing data.
  • To evaluate the impact of imputation methods on Type I and Type II error rates for detecting intervention effects.
  • To assess the influence of factors like cluster size, number of clusters, and intracluster correlation on imputation strategy effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted to evaluate imputation strategies including cluster mean imputation and various multiple imputation approaches.
  • Multiple imputation methods considered included using within-cluster data and pooling data across clusters, with and without accounting for intracluster correlation.
  • The performance of each strategy was assessed based on Type I and Type II error rates of the adjusted two-sample t-test for intervention effects.

Main Results:

  • Cluster mean imputation provides valid inferences and is simple, but may be less powerful than pooled methods, particularly with small cluster sizes or variable follow-up rates.
  • When pooling data, accounting for intracluster correlation is generally recommended for valid inferences.
  • Standard multiple imputation (without intracluster correlation adjustment) can yield acceptable Type I error rates and be more powerful than specialized methods when intracluster correlation is small or the number of clusters is limited.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of imputation strategy in cluster randomized trials depends on factors such as cluster size, intracluster correlation, and available statistical software.
  • While cluster mean imputation is a viable option for its simplicity, pooled multiple imputation methods, particularly those accounting for intracluster correlation, often offer greater statistical power.
  • Standard multiple imputation procedures may be a practical and powerful alternative when specialized methods accounting for intracluster correlation are unavailable or when the number of clusters is small.