Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point served as...
Adjusting a Traverse01:12

Adjusting a Traverse

In the site survey of a four-sided traverse, internal angles are essential to ensure geometric accuracy. The survey revealed that the sum of the measured internal angles was 359 degrees and 48 minutes, which is 12 minutes less than the expected 360 degrees. This discrepancy signals an error likely arising from measurement inaccuracies during the fieldwork.To rectify this error, the adjustment process involved distributing the 12-minute shortfall equally across the four internal angles. By...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of Psychometric Performance of Faculty and Student Authored Anatomy Exam Items in Medical Education.

Medical science educator·2026
Same author

Best practice for forensic anthropology reporting: a statement by the Board of the Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe (FASE).

International journal of legal medicine·2026
Same author

Rallying and Amplifying Faculty Voice During Periods of Curriculum Reform.

Medical science educator·2026
Same author

Family stress model and parenting in infancy: Social support and parenting self-efficacy as resilience factors.

Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)·2025
Same author

The impact of traditional versus hotspot-driven anatomy practical assessment on student cognitive processes.

Anatomical sciences education·2025
Same author

Applying multidisciplinary methods to forensic casework in North Carolina.

Forensic sciences research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
05:49

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Published on: February 23, 2024

Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania.

Ann H Ross1, Shanna Williams

  • 1Department of Sociology and Anthropology, NC State University, CB 8107, Raleigh, NC 27695-8107, USA.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|June 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Precision in 3D cranial landmark analysis is affected by landmark type. Type 3 landmarks introduce significant digitizing error, impacting repeatability and validation of coordinate data.

More Related Videos

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
05:49

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Published on: February 23, 2024

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Anthropometry
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Forensic Science

Background:

  • Three-dimensional (3D) coordinate data are increasingly used in anatomical and anthropological studies.
  • Ensuring the precision, repeatability, and validation of these data is crucial for reliable research outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the precision, repeatability, and validation of three-dimensional (3D) cranial landmark coordinates.
  • To identify sources of error in landmark data collection and analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Two observers collected 19 homologous cranial landmarks from three skulls across three separate sessions.
  • Statistical analysis of 171 interlandmark distances (ILDs) using mixed model ANOVA and GLM procedures.

Main Results:

  • Significant within-subject error was detected in 32% of interlandmark distances (ILDs).
  • Significant between-observer variation and observer-by-session differences were found in multiple ILDs.
  • Errors were predominantly associated with type 3 landmarks, which have a substantial arbitrary component.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must be aware of measurement discrepancies associated with type 3 landmarks.
  • Careful selection of landmarks is essential for accurate 3D coordinate data evaluation and reliable research findings.