Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

05:58
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task
1Department of Psychology, University of Otago, New Zealand. balsop@psy.otago.ac.nz
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|June 11, 2008
Summary
Pigeons in a delayed matching-to-sample task adjusted their key choices based on reinforcement location and color. Side-key biases were more influenced by reinforcement location than color, suggesting distinct control mechanisms in conditional discrimination.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Animal Cognition
- Learning and Memory
Background:
- Delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) is a key paradigm for studying memory and choice behavior.
- Understanding how reinforcement history influences choice is crucial for behavioral models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how pigeons' choices in a DMTS task are affected by independent variations in reinforcement location and color.
- To compare the sensitivity of side-key and comparison-color biases to reinforcement distributions.
Main Methods:
- Six pigeons were trained on a DMTS task with yellow sample stimuli and red/green comparison stimuli.
- Reinforcer delivery was systematically varied across key location and color independently.
- Response ratios (left/right and red/green) were analyzed in relation to reinforcer ratios.
Main Results:
- Matching accuracy remained high across conditions.
- Side-key responses tracked the ratio of left to right reinforcers.
- Comparison-color responses tracked the ratio of red to green reinforcers, with no interaction.
- Side-key biases showed greater sensitivity to location-based reinforcement than color biases did to color-based reinforcement.
Conclusions:
- Pigeon's choice behavior in DMTS is differentially controlled by reinforcement location and color.
- Findings support an extended Davison and Tustin (1978) model but are also consistent with alternative conditional discrimination theories.
- The results highlight the importance of considering independent reinforcement dimensions in understanding choice behavior.

