Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Frequency of HbA1c discordance in estimating blood glucose control
1Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0547, USA. robert.cohen@uc.edu
Insights
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is crucial for diabetes management, but interpretation challenges exist. New research highlights factors like erythrocyte lifespan that can affect HbA1c accuracy, necessitating a nuanced approach to glycemic control assessment.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a standard biomarker for assessing long-term glycemic control in diabetes.
- Emerging evidence suggests potential discrepancies between HbA1c and other glycemia measures, complicating interpretation.
- Clinicians must be aware of factors influencing HbA1c accuracy for optimal patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore emerging issues that complicate the interpretation of HbA1c values.
- To characterize discordances between HbA1c and other glycemia measures.
- To inform clinical practice regarding HbA1c interpretation in diabetes management.
Main Methods:
- Development of the 'glycation gap' concept to compare intracellular (HbA1c) and extracellular (fructosamine) protein glycation.
- Analysis of physiological variables, such as erythrocyte lifespan, in relation to HbA1c discordance.
- Review of factors affecting hemoglobin glycation, HbA1c-glycemia relationships, assay standardization, and complication risk.
Main Results:
- Evidence indicates mismatches between HbA1c and other glycemia measures, requiring cautious interpretation.
- Physiological variables, including erythrocyte lifespan in hematologically normal individuals, can explain discordant HbA1c results.
- Factors influencing hemoglobin glycation and assay standardization impact HbA1c accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Standard interpretation norms for HbA1c may need modification in various clinical scenarios.
- Understanding factors causing discordance is crucial for accurate glycemic control assessment and complication risk prediction.
- Nuances in HbA1c interpretation are increasingly important for effective diabetes care.
Purpose Of Review:
HbA1c is a trusted standard for monitoring glycemic control and predicting complications. However, there are emerging issues complicating the interpretation of HbA1c that the clinician caring for patients with diabetes needs to consider.
Recent Findings:
There is increasing evidence of the potential for mismatches between HbA1c and other measures of glycemia which require some caution in HbA1c interpretation. We have attempted to characterize the nature of these discordances by developing the concept of the 'glycation gap' in which differences in protein glycation occurring in the intracellular space (HbA1c) versus in the extracellular space (measured as fructosamine) are compared. We have evidence that HbA1c results discordant from other measures of glycemic control may be secondary to previously unappreciated physiological variables, including erythrocyte lifespan, in hematologically normal individuals. We relate these findings to a number of HbA1c interpretation issues important for diabetes care: factors affecting hemoglobin glycation, relationship of HbA1c to glycemia, standardization of the HbA1c assay, and HbA1c relation to complications.
Summary:
There are an increasing number of clinical circumstances in which there are nuances to HbA1c interpretation such that standard norms for assessment of glycemic control or complication risk may need to be modified.
Related Concept Videos
Hyperglycemia
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Hypoglycemia
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications