Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Target-absent controls in blocking experiments with rats.

Kathleen M Taylor1, Victory T Joseph, Peter D Balsam

  • 1Barnard College, New York, New York, USA.

Learning & Behavior
|June 12, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated device for permitting free movement during simultaneous photometry and electrophysiology in mice.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

All cells have the capacity to time.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2026
Same author

Impact of temporal uncertainty on sign-tracking behavior.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025
Same author

Both probability and rate of reinforcement can affect the acquisition and maintenance of conditioned responses.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2024
Same author

Inhibition of striatal indirect pathway during second postnatal week leads to long-lasting deficits in motivated behavior.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2024
Same author

Learning depends on the information conveyed by temporal relationships between events and is reflected in the dopamine response to cues.

Science advances·2024
Same journal

Correction: Quantifying nonmnemonic strategies in two-alternative forced-choice delayed matching and nonmatching-to-position tasks in mice (Mus musculus) using automated video tracking technologies.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Unconditional stimulus deflation is stimulus specific.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

What is possible and what is worth: Higher levers afford more work and enhance the value of leisure.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Behavioral impact of adolescent social isolation stress: A multidimensional assessment in male NMRI mice.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Behavioral characteristics of rapid visual categorization learning in domestic chicks.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Operant conditioning through positive reinforcement in the ghost crab (Ocypode quadrata).

Learning & behavior·2026
See all related articles

Blocking experiments in rats demonstrate that blocking occurs when a target stimulus is present during training. Unsignaled reinforcement elevated contextual excitation, influencing responding in control groups.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral neuroscience
  • Animal learning and behavior

Background:

  • Blocking is a phenomenon in associative learning where prior conditioning of one stimulus prevents a second stimulus from becoming associated with a reinforcer.
  • Understanding blocking is crucial for elucidating the mechanisms of associative learning and stimulus control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate blocking in rats using concurrent and forward blocking paradigms.
  • To differentiate blocking from effects of general reinforcement and stimulus exposure using rigorous control procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Three between-groups experiments with rats were conducted, employing Kamin, Wagner, and C+ control procedures.
  • Target stimulus-absent control groups were used to assess the impact of non-target stimuli exposure.
  • Behavioral responding during test phases was measured to assess associative strength.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Experiment 1 showed no difference between concurrent blocking and Kamin control, but higher responding in Wagner control, potentially due to contextual excitation.
  • Experiment 2 found no difference between concurrent blocking and C+ control groups.
  • Experiment 3 provided plausible evidence for blocking, with less responding in the forward blocking group compared to the C+ control when the target stimulus was present during training.

Conclusions:

  • The results suggest that blocking can be demonstrated using concurrent and forward paradigms with appropriate controls.
  • Unsignaled reinforcement can elevate contextual excitation, impacting control group performance.
  • Forward blocking was more clearly evidenced than concurrent blocking in these experiments.