Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry
Published on: June 6, 2025
Clinical evaluation of restorations with self-etch adhesive and nanofilled composite in class I and class II cavities
Neshka A Manchorova1, Stoyan B Vladimirov, Zoya K Donencheva
1Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. nmanchorowa@yahoo.com
Introduction:
In the era of adhesive restorative dentistry the principles of conventional cavity preparation have acquired a new meaning. The emphasis is shifted from "widening for preventive purposes" and preparation of macro-mechanical retention to "consciously limited" preparation. The clinical and biological durability of restorations depends on the adhesive bond and the quality of the composite material.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to conduct a clinical evaluation of restorations with a self-etch single-step adhesive and nanofilled composite in class I and class II cavities over a period of 15 months.
Patients And Methods:
The clinical trial involved 34 patient (volunteers) who received 76 posterior restorations of medium and deep cavities with the self-etch adhesive Adper Prompt L-Pop and nanofilled composite Filtek Supreme (3MESPE Dental products USA). All restorations were evaluated by the modified Ryge and Cvar criteria at 6- and 15-month intervals.
Results:
Loss of restorations with a self-etch single-step adhesive and nanofilled composite at 6 months and 15 months was 0% and 6.7%, respectively. The evaluation of discolouration in the restorations at 6 months revealed no significant changes (P > 0.05, u = 1.72). There was certain deterioration in the colour at 15 months (P < 0.05, u = 2.96). Statistically significant changes in the marginal discolouration were observed at 6 months (P < 0.05, u = 2.79) in comparison with the initial scores. During the 15-month follow-up the discolouration on the margins of the restorations was statistically nonsignificant compared to the 6-month follow-up (P > 0.05, u = 0.36). There were no C (Charlie) scores recorded during the 15-month follow-up study within the continuing observation.
Conclusion:
The restorations with nanofilled composite and self-etch single-step adhesive fulfill the requirements for clinical use in posterior restorations.