Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Update from a Randomized Clinical Trial of Limited Versus Extended Dissection.

European urology·2024
Same author

Successful completion of large, low-cost randomized cancer trials at an academic cancer center.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2024
Same author

Testosterone Therapy in Men After Radical Prostatectomy for Low-Intermediate Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer.

The Journal of urology·2024
Same author

Re: Early Prostate Cancer Deaths Among Men with Higher vs Lower Genetic Risk.

European urology·2024
Same author

Transperineal vs Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-The PREVENT Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA oncology·2024
Same author

Clinical utility of an artificial intelligence radiomics-based tool for risk stratification of pulmonary nodules.

JNCI cancer spectrum·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Basic introduction to research: how not to do research.

Andrew J Vickers1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. vickersa@mskcc.org

Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology
|June 12, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article debunks common myths about clinical research, emphasizing that rigorous training and support are essential for high-quality studies. Poorly conducted research poses significant risks, making qualified researchers crucial for patient well-being.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Prevalent myths in clinical research, particularly within complementary and alternative medicine, suggest minimal qualifications are needed.
  • A double standard exists where clinicians demand high standards for patient care but not for research.
  • Clinical research significantly impacts public health, making research quality paramount.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and critique common misconceptions regarding the conduct of clinical research.
  • To highlight the critical need for proper training, statistical expertise, and institutional support in research.

Main Methods:

  • Didactic review of prevalent myths in clinical research.
  • Analysis of the implications of these myths, especially in specific medical communities.
  • Comparison of standards in clinical practice versus clinical research.

Main Results:

  • Identified myths include: 'anyone can do research,' self-teaching from literature, reliance on software alone for statistics, 'kitchen sink' research, and focusing on effort over quality.
  • These myths are particularly noted in complementary and alternative medicine.
  • The potential harm from flawed research is argued to be greater than from poor medical practice.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical research requires specialized training, statistical support, and institutional resources.
  • Conducting research without adequate qualifications is potentially more dangerous than inadequate clinical practice.
  • Upholding high standards in clinical research is vital for patient safety and reliable medical guidance.