Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
Published on: August 12, 2013
Systematic errors for a Mueller matrix dual rotating compensator ellipsometer
Laurent Broch1, Aotmane En Naciri, Luc Johann
1Laboratoire de Physique des Milieux Denses, Universite Paul Verlaine - Metz, 1 Boulevard Arago CP 87811, F-57078 METZ Cedex 3, France. broch@univ-metz.fr
This study details systematic errors in Mueller matrix ellipsometry, crucial for analyzing anisotropic materials. A new four-zone measurement method effectively eliminates these errors for precise analysis.
Area of Science:
- Optical Physics
- Materials Science
Background:
- Ellipsometry is vital for characterizing anisotropic materials and complex systems.
- Mueller matrix ellipsometers are essential for precise measurements, but susceptible to errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize systematic errors in dual-rotating compensator Mueller Matrix Ellipsometers.
- To develop a method for eliminating these errors for improved analytical precision.
Main Methods:
- Derivation of first-order error expressions for Mueller matrix coefficients.
- Analysis of errors from azimuthal misalignment and optical element imperfections.
- Proposal of a four-zone averaging measurement technique.
Main Results:
- Explicit expressions for systematic errors in Mueller matrix coefficients were derived.
- The impact of component misalignment and imperfect optics on measurements was quantified.
- The proposed four-zone averaging method effectively cancels systematic errors.
Conclusions:
- Accurate Mueller matrix ellipsometry requires careful characterization and correction of systematic errors.
- The novel four-zone averaging method provides a robust solution for enhancing measurement precision.
- This work advances the reliable analysis of anisotropic materials using Mueller matrix ellipsometry.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
