Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
Removal of arsenic from high ionic strength solutions: effects of ionic strength, pH, and preformed versus in situ
Kenneth L Mercer1, John E Tobiason
1Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 18 Marston Hall, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-9293, USA. kmercer@ecs.umass.edu
Abstract:
Arsenic sorption to hydrous ferric oxide (HFO) is an effective treatment method for removing dissolved arsenic from fresh drinking water sources. However, detailed information is limited regarding arsenic removal from solutions of high ionic strength such as brackish groundwater, seawater, or high-pressure membrane process residuals. Bench-scale treatment experiments were conducted exploring arsenic removal from simple solutions with ionic strengths ranging from 0.008 to 1.5 M by addition of ferric chloride followed by solid/liquid separation (microfiltration or ultrafiltration). Arsenic removal from these solutions during in situ iron precipitation was approximately 90% at Fe:As molar ratios of 10 to 15 and > 95% for Fe:As molar ratios greater than 20. Arsenic removal at iron doses of 10(-6) to 10(-4) mol-Fe/L improved when pH was lowered from 8 to less than 6.5 at ionic strength 0.2 M; this improvement was not as significant at ionic strength 0.7 M. Arsenic removal diminished when alkalinity was increased from 400 to 1,400 mg/L as calcium carbonate; however, arsenic removal at the higher alkalinity improved when pH was lowered from approximately 8 to less than 7. Arsenic removal with preformed HFO solids and subsequent microfiltration was significantly less than that observed with in situ HFO precipitation. Increased removal by in situ precipitation compared to that of preformed solids is explained by an increased number of adsorption sites due to uptake during iron oxy-hydroxide polymerization as well as an increase in surface area resulting in diminished surface charge effects. Model simulations of arsenic uptake by in situ precipitation adequately captured these effect by changing the model parameters used to model arsenic uptake by preformed HFO, specificallythe total number of surface sites and surface area.
More Related Videos
08:21Determination of Inorganic Arsenic in a Wide Range of Food Matrices using Hydride Generation - Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.
Published on: September 1, 2017
12:55Quantification of Humic and Fulvic Acids in Humate Ores, DOC, Humified Materials and Humic Substance-Containing Commercial Products
Published on: March 18, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Extraction: Advanced Methods
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Factors Affecting Solubility
Strong Acid and Base Solutions
Polyprotic Acids
Coagulation