Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
Standard Precaution01:26

Standard Precaution

Standard precautions are the minimum infection control safeguards used while caring for all patients, irrespective of their disease condition. They help prevent the spread of common infectious microorganisms to healthcare workers, patients, and visitors in all healthcare settings.
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Torts I01:14

Torts I

Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...
Nursing Clinical Information System01:27

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Standard of care.

The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association·2009
Same author

Red as a beet.

The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association·2007
Same author

Migraine prevention.

Headache·2006
Same author

Duplicate publication.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2006
Same author

An otolaryngology, neurology, allergy, and primary care consensus on diagnosis and treatment of sinus headache.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2006
Same author

Acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine versus sumatriptan succinate in the early treatment of migraine: results from the ASSET trial--a comment.

Headache·2006

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

A Standardized Procedure of Dressing Management for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
07:22

A Standardized Procedure of Dressing Management for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Published on: March 14, 2025

Standard of care.

Harvey J Blumenthal1, John R Woodard

  • 1University of Oklahoma College of Medicine-Psychiatry and Neurology, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Headache
|June 14, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The "standard of care" is a legal term, not a scientific one, often used in medical articles without clear definition. Its legal application can impact physician autonomy in patient treatment.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

A Standardized Procedure of Dressing Management for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
07:22

A Standardized Procedure of Dressing Management for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Published on: March 14, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Legal Medicine
  • Medical Ethics
  • Neurology

Background:

  • The term "standard of care" is frequently used in scientific literature concerning patient management, particularly in headache treatment.
  • Despite its prevalence, the term often lacks clear definition and scientific validation within medical research.
  • Its origins lie in legal statutes and jury instructions, varying by state.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the legal versus scientific nature of the "standard of care."
  • To examine the implications of using this legal term in medical research and practice.
  • To highlight the potential risks to physician autonomy and individualized patient care.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of legal definitions and codifications of "standard of care" across state statutes.
  • Review of scientific literature for the usage and definition of "standard of care" in patient management, specifically for headaches.
  • Examination of the legal implications for physicians in malpractice cases.

Main Results:

  • "Standard of care" is primarily a legal concept, not a scientifically derived medical principle.
  • The application of this legal term in medical contexts is often undefined and lacks empirical evidence.
  • Jury instructions incorporating "standard of care" can be used detrimentally against physicians in legal proceedings.

Conclusions:

  • Physicians must recognize "standard of care" as a legal construct with potential to undermine individualized patient treatment.
  • The scientific community should critically evaluate the use and definition of "standard of care" in medical literature.
  • Protecting a physician's right to provide patient-specific care requires understanding the legal underpinnings of this term.