Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Noninvasive Sampling of Mucosal Lining Fluid for the Quantification of In Vivo Upper Airway Immune-mediator Levels
Published on: August 7, 2017
A Danish population-based cohort study of newly diagnosed asthmatic children's care pathway - adherence to guidelines
Grete Moth1, Peter O Schiotz, Peter Vedsted
1Danish Paediatric Asthma Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark. grete.moth@alm.au.dk
Insights
Asthma care varies significantly by provider. Hospital specialists adhere to guidelines more often than general practitioners, but overall adherence remains low, impacting pediatric asthma management.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Health Services Research
- Clinical Quality Improvement
Background:
- Childhood asthma is a prevalent chronic condition with significant variations in healthcare utilization and associated costs.
- Disparities in care pathways between general practitioners and specialists may impact the quality of asthma management in children.
- Understanding the relationship between care providers and adherence to asthma guidelines is crucial for optimizing pediatric care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the association between different healthcare providers (GPs, specialists) and adherence to asthma care guidelines in children.
- To evaluate the quality of asthma care pathways based on provider type and guideline adherence.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 36,940 children (aged 6-14) with new asthma diagnoses was conducted using national registry data.
- Prevalence ratios were calculated to assess associations between provider type and adherence to three quality indicators.
- Analyses were adjusted for demographic factors, socioeconomic status, county, and disease severity.
Main Results:
- Most children (70.3%) received care solely from general practitioners (GPs).
- Overall guideline adherence across all quality indicators was low (7%), with higher rates for specialists (16-28%) compared to GPs (3%).
- Hospital specialists showed a significantly higher propensity (8.81 times) for guideline-adherent care compared to GPs.
Conclusions:
- While hospital specialists demonstrate better adherence to asthma guidelines than GPs, overall compliance remains suboptimal.
- Further research is needed to determine the clinical impact of guideline non-adherence and to refine asthma care pathways for children.
- Investigating potential over-prescription of follow-up frequency in guidelines or the need for stratified care models is warranted.
Background:
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood. Large variations exist concerning the number of children being treated by general practitioners and by specialists. Consequently, health related costs due to this disease vary as care by specialists is more expensive compared with care by general practitioners. Little is known of the consequences of these variations concerning the quality of care. The aim of the study was to analyse associations between care providers and adherence to guidelines concerning frequency of contacts with the health service due to asthma.
Methods:
A cohort study was performed of 36,940 incident asthmatic children's (aged 6-14) contacts with the health service using the unique personal registration number to link data from five national registries. The prevalence ratios were calculated for associations between provider (general practitioner, primary care specialist, hospital specialist or both GP and specialist) and adherence with guidelines concerning three indicators of quality of care pathway: 1) diagnostic examination of lung function at start of medical treatment 2) follow-up the first six months and 3) follow-up the next six months. The associations were adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic status, county, and severity of disease.
Results:
Most children (70.3%) had only been seen by their GP. About 80% of the children were treated with inhaled steroids, 70% were treated with inhaled steroids as well as inhaled beta2agonists and 13% were treated with inhaled beta2agonists only. A total of 12,650 children (34.2%) had no registered asthma-related contacts with the health service except when redeeming prescriptions. Care was in accordance with guidelines in all three indicators of quality in 7% of the cases (GPs only: 3%, primary care specialists only: 16%, hospital specialists: 28%, and both GP and specialists: 13%). Primary care specialists had a 5.01, hospital specialists a 8.81 and both GP and specialists a 4.32 times higher propensity to provide a clinical pathway according to guidelines compared to GPs alone.
Conclusion:
The majority of the children were seen in general practice. Hospital specialists provided care in accordance with guidelines nine times more often compared with GPs, but still only one quarter of these children had pathways in accordance with guidelines. It is relevant to study further if these lacks of adherence to guidelines have implications for the asthmatic children or if guidelines are too demanding concerning frequency of follow-up or if asthmatic children should be stratified to different care pathways.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
Asthma III: Clinical Manifestations
Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include: