Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Cryptogenic stroke in a patient with a PFO: a decision analysis
Sagit Stern1, Matan J Cohen, Dan Gilon
1Center for Clinical Quality and Safety, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Background:
Octogenarian Israeli prime-minister Ariel Sharon recently sustained a mild, reversible stroke. A patent foramen ovale (PFO) was detected and anticoagulants were given pending PFO closure. A few days later, he sustained major intracerebral hemorrhage and has since remained in vegetative state. The events triggered serious criticism in the mass media, experts promoting one management option over others. Because knowledge of outcome and hindsight bias evaluation of appropriateness of care, we sought to systematically review the clinical case.
Methods:
We performed a formal decision analysis to identify the preferred management between anticoagulation, antiplatelets, PFO closure, or no treatment. Using the best evidence available, we built a decision tree.
Main Outcomes:
recurrent stroke and treatment complications within 1 year.
Results:
Optimal decision was found to be critically sensitive to assumptions about etiology, efficacy and safety of treatments, recurrence risk, and to small changes in utilities. In multiway sensitivity analysis, when the risk of recurrent stroke was <0.12 per year, no treatment was the best management. PFO closure is dominant only when the risk of recurrent stroke is >0.12 per year closure effectiveness is assumed to be <0.28. When closure effectiveness is >0.6, it is inferior to anticoagulation and antiplatelet management.
Conclusions:
Uncertainties precluded a clear-cut answer and choice was found to be a "toss-up," often associated with much controversy. Use of novel therapies, such as PFO closure, outside clinical trials will not reduce uncertainty about efficacy.
Insights
Managing stroke risk in patients with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) involves complex decisions. Treatment effectiveness is highly sensitive to individual risk factors and therapy efficacy, making a definitive "best" approach uncertain.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Medical Decision Making
Background:
- A high-profile stroke case involving a patient with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) highlighted public and expert debate on stroke management options.
- The patient experienced a transient ischemic attack, followed by anticoagulation, and subsequently a major intracerebral hemorrhage after PFO closure was considered.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the clinical case and perform a formal decision analysis.
- To identify the optimal management strategy for stroke prevention in patients with PFO, comparing anticoagulation, antiplatelets, PFO closure, and no treatment.
Main Methods:
- A decision tree analysis was constructed using the best available evidence.
- Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of various assumptions on the optimal treatment strategy.
Main Results:
- Optimal management decisions were critically sensitive to assumptions regarding stroke etiology, treatment efficacy, safety, recurrence risk, and patient utility values.
- No treatment was preferred when the annual risk of recurrent stroke was below 0.12. PFO closure was favored only when recurrence risk exceeded 0.12 and closure effectiveness was less than 0.28.
- PFO closure was inferior to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy when closure effectiveness exceeded 0.6.
Conclusions:
- Significant uncertainties exist regarding the optimal management of stroke in PFO patients, leading to controversy.
- Utilizing novel therapies like PFO closure outside of clinical trials does not resolve uncertainties about their efficacy.
More Related Videos
07:41Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction