Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial.

Stephen G West1, Naihua Duan, Willo Pequegnat

  • 1Psychology Department, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA. sgwest@asu.edu

American Journal of Public Health
|June 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing Cancer Care Delivery Through High-Functioning Teams: Results of Implementing the 4R Oncology Model in Lung and Breast Cancers.

JCO oncology practice·2026
Same author

Qualitative System Dynamics Modeling to Support Community Planning in Opioid Overdose Prevention.

Research on social work practice·2026
Same author

Financial Toxicity of Hematologic Malignancy Therapies, Including Cellular Therapy and Its Impact on Access to Care: Prospective Pilot Study.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same author

Micro-costing analysis of a community-based psychiatric intervention among people who inject drugs in Haiphong, Vietnam.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

On-site health service delivery models at syringe services programs in the United States: Results of a national cross-sectional survey.

Drug and alcohol dependence reports·2025
Same author

Substance Use Monitoring Among People Who Use Drugs Using a Novel Assay to Test Dried Blood Spot Specimens.

Substance use & misuse·2025
Same journal

Erratum In: "Ogunbajo et al. Respond".

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Role of Gender in HIV Care Engagement Among Individuals Assigned Male Sex at Birth: Medical Monitoring Project, United States, 2015-2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Domestic Returns to Predictable US Participation in the World Health Organization: Health Security and Cost.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

The Risks of Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, and Pulmonary Complications in Cancer Patients Who Smoke Cigarettes and Switch to E-Cigarettes: South Korea, 2015‒2022.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Retailers CARE Program in Montgomery County, Ohio, Partners With Alcohol, Tobacco, and Lottery Retailers to Promote Healthier Communities.

American journal of public health·2026
Same journal

Trends in Sexual Activity, Condom Use, and Use of Pregnancy Prevention Methods Among Female Adolescents: United States, 2007-2023.

American journal of public health·2026
See all related articles

Public health research faces challenges where randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are not feasible. This study explores alternative designs for strong causal inference in observational research.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard but not always feasible for public health research questions.
  • Emerging public health issues like environmental tobacco smoke exposure and disaster impacts (e.g., Hurricane Katrina) necessitate alternative research designs.
  • Causal inference is crucial for understanding health outcomes and informing interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore alternative research designs beyond RCTs that allow for strong causal inferences in public health.
  • To present methods for addressing new research questions where traditional RCTs are not applicable.
  • To discuss validity threats and mitigation strategies for these alternative designs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of potential outcomes framework (Rubin Causal Model) and Campbellian perspectives.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of randomized encouragement designs where participation is invited but not mandated.
  • Analysis of quantitative assignment designs based on measurable criteria (need, merit, risk).
  • Consideration of observational studies with non-randomized treatment assignment.

    • Main Results:

    • Alternative designs like randomized encouragement and quantitative assignment offer pathways to stronger causal inferences than purely observational studies.
    • Each design presents unique validity threats, such as non-compliance in encouragement designs or unobserved confounders in quantitative assignment and observational studies.
    • Statistical strategies can mitigate major threats to the internal and external validity of these designs.

    Conclusions:

    • Alternative research designs are essential for addressing complex public health questions when RCTs are infeasible.
    • Careful consideration of design-specific threats and application of appropriate statistical methods are vital for robust causal inference.
    • These approaches enhance the ability of public health researchers to draw meaningful conclusions from diverse study settings.