Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Comparative validity of the Shedler and Westen Assessment Procedure-200
Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt1, Thomas A Widiger
1Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA. stephanie.sweatt@gmail.com
Abstract:
A predominant dimensional model of general personality structure is the five-factor model (FFM). Quite a number of alternative instruments have been developed to assess the domains of the FFM. The current study compares the validity of 2 alternative versions of the Shedler and Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200) FFM scales, 1 that was developed on the basis of items identified by J. Shedler and D. Westen (2004) and 1 that used items identified by R. R. McCrae, C. E. Lokenhoff, and P. T. Costa (2005). The comparative validity of both measures was examined in a sample of persons who evidenced personality-related problems in living (N = 94). The McCrae et al. Neuroticism, Agreeableness, and Openness scales were superior to their respective Shedler and Westen scales. Both research teams developed comparably valid Extraversion and Conscientiousness scales. Implications of the results for future SWAP-200 research are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...