Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.

Christian Forkstam1, Asa Elwér, Martin Ingvar

  • 1Cognitive Neurophysiology Research Group, Stockholm Brain Institute, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. christian.forkstam@mpi.nl

Brain Research
|June 20, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Fitzgerald et al.: Mischaracterizing our findings; the cognitive profile of elite footballers remains robust.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Brain aging in bipolar disorder using a neuroimaging and machine learning-derived metric: Findings from the ENIGMA BD Working Group.

Journal of affective disorders·2026
Same author

Language Comprehension in Background Noise - Effects of Noise Type and Task Modality.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Is There a Dissociation Between Deficit Subtypes in Word Reading and/or Spelling? A Longitudinal Study From Grade 1 to Grade 4 Across Orthographies.

Dyslexia (Chichester, England)·2025
Same author

Including people in the automatic text adaptation process: empirical findings from students with intellectual disability.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2025
Same author

Reply to Musculus et al.: A case of offside in scientific discourse?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Electroacupuncture treatment enhances hippocampal growth hormone level and restores mitochondrial function in vascular dementia rats.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Effects of transcutaneous auricular nerve stimulation on thalamic relay: A randomized brain imaging study in chronic low back pain patients.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Adaptive reconfiguration of prefrontal networks during prolonged cognitive interference: Evidence from fNIRS.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Horizontal image compression significantly impairs human face identity recognition.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Altered theta-band sensory gating in individuals with high sensory processing sensitivity (SPS).

Brain research·2026
See all related articles

Implicit artificial grammar learning reveals that how people classify grammatical structures doesn't depend on instructions. Both grammaticality and preference classification methods yield similar knowledge acquisition about underlying rules.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Implicit learning is crucial for natural language acquisition.
  • Artificial grammar learning (AGL) models aspects of language acquisition.
  • AGL paradigms investigate how humans learn underlying structures implicitly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare yes-no grammaticality classification with yes-no preference classification in AGL.
  • To determine if instruction type affects knowledge acquisition of underlying generative mechanisms.
  • To assess the impact of local substring familiarity on classification performance.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: 5-day short-term memory task with grammatical strings and no feedback.
  • Experiment 2: Acquisition material changed to random strings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 3: Contrasted repeated vs. non-repeated preference classification.

    • Main Results:

    • Classification performance was independent of instruction type after 5 days.
    • Both preference and grammaticality groups acquired knowledge to a similar degree.
    • Classification shifted to local substring familiarity with random strings, decreasing with repeated preference classification but not grammaticality classification.

    Conclusions:

    • Classification performance in AGL is largely independent of instruction type.
    • Forced-choice preference classification is equivalent to grammaticality classification.
    • Learned knowledge reflects underlying generative mechanisms, not just surface features.