Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview
Sanger Sequencing01:57

Sanger Sequencing

DNA sequencing is a fundamental technique that is routinely used in the biological sciences. This method can be applied to a range of questions at different scales - from the sequencing of a cloned DNA fragment or the study of a mutation in a gene up to whole-genome sequencing. However, despite the widespread use of sequencing today, it was not until 1977 that Fredrick Sanger and his collaborators developed the chain-termination method to decode DNA sequences. It relies on the separation of a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining Population Genomics With Ancient DNA to Understand Island Colonisation History of the Madagascar Turtle Dove.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same author

Repeated losses of self-fertility shaped heterozygosity and polyploidy in yeast evolution.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

The Baldwin Effect Reloaded: Intermediate Levels of Phenotypic Plasticity Favor Evolutionary Rescue.

The American naturalist·2025
Same author

Chromosome-level genome assembly of the European green woodpecker Picus viridis.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2024
Same author

CNCA aligns small annotated genomes.

BMC bioinformatics·2024
Same author

Chance Favors the Prepared Genomes: Horizontal Transfer Shapes the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance Mutations in Core Genes.

Molecular biology and evolution·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Testing for neutrality in samples with sequencing errors.

Guillaume Achaz1

  • 1Systématique, Adaptation et Evolution (UMR 7138) and Atelier de Bioinformatique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI, 75005 Paris, France. achaz@abi.snv.jussieu.fr

Genetics
|June 20, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sequencing errors in population genetics data can bias evolutionary analyses. New methods ignoring singletons improve accuracy and detect deviations from neutral evolution in datasets with errors.

More Related Videos

Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example
05:45

Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example

Published on: March 11, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example
05:45

Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example

Published on: March 11, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Population genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Evolutionary biology

Background:

  • Population genetics datasets often contain sequencing errors, primarily as singletons.
  • These errors can significantly bias common summary statistics and neutrality tests.
  • Incorrect inferences about evolutionary scenarios arise from artifactual data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of sequencing errors on population genetics statistics.
  • To develop new methods for accurate neutrality testing in the presence of errors.
  • To propose robust estimators for population genetics parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of sequencing error impact on summary statistics.
  • Development of two new theta estimators that disregard singletons.
  • Introduction of two new neutrality tests (Y and Y*) robust to sequencing errors.

Main Results:

  • Sequencing errors, especially singletons, strongly bias estimators of theta.
  • Neutrality tests based on frequency spectrum incorrectly reject neutrality with moderate errors.
  • New Y and Y* tests demonstrate power in detecting deviations from neutral models, even when ignoring singletons.

Conclusions:

  • Sequencing errors necessitate careful data handling in population genetics.
  • The proposed singleton-ignoring estimators and Y/Y* tests offer improved accuracy.
  • These new methods enhance the reliability of evolutionary scenario inferences from potentially erroneous datasets.