Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Summarizing differences in cumulative incidence functions.

Mei-Jie Zhang1, Jason Fine

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. meijie@mcw.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|June 20, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Competing-triggering effect models for multitype recurrent event data.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Real-world heterogeneity in the prognostic value of pre-transplant flow cytometry measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: CIBMTR analysis.

Haematologica·2026
Same author

Outcomes of myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with omidubicel vs alternative donor sources.

Blood neoplasia·2026
Same author

Outcomes of people living with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received inotuzumab ozogamicin before a stem cell transplant: a plain language summary.

Future oncology (London, England)·2025
Same author

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation in advanced systemic mastocytosis in the new era: A CIBMTR study.

British journal of haematology·2025
Same author

Causal effect estimation for competing risk data in randomized trial: adjusting covariates to gain efficiency.

Journal of applied statistics·2025
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

New methods offer simple, interpretable summaries for group differences in competing risks studies. These nonparametric inferences improve upon existing log-rank test extensions and proportional hazards models for cumulative incidence functions.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Competing risks studies are crucial for analyzing time-to-event data with multiple event types.
  • Current methods like extensions of the log-rank test lack simple, interpretable summaries for group differences.
  • Proportional hazards models adapted for cumulative incidence functions present interpretation challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop nonparametric inferences for general summary measures of group differences in competing risks.
  • To provide methods for both time-varying and time-averaged summary measures.
  • To offer interpretable alternatives to existing statistical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized counting process techniques for theoretical justification.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposed nonparametric inferences for cumulative incidence function summary measures.
  • Developed methods for time-varying and time-averaged measures.

    • Main Results:

    • Established theoretical justification for the proposed nonparametric inferences.
    • Demonstrated the practical utility of the methods through a real data example.
    • Provided a framework for obtaining interpretable summaries of group differences.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed nonparametric methods offer a valuable tool for analyzing competing risks data.
    • These methods provide simple and interpretable summaries of group differences.
    • The approach enhances the analysis of cumulative incidence functions in various research fields.