Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dialogues on prediction errors.

Yael Niv1, Geoffrey Schoenbaum

  • 1Center for the Study of Brain, Mind and Behavior and Department of Psychology, Green Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. yael@princeton.edu

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|June 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The oracle and the didact: Orbitofrontal influences on learning and dopaminergic error signaling.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Protocol for a randomized trial to predict the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions for symptoms of depression.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Prior cocaine use disrupts identification of hidden states by single units and neural ensembles in orbitofrontal cortex.

eLife·2026
Same author

Persistent representation of a prior schema in the orbitofrontal cortex facilitates learning of a conflicting schema.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Improving the Reliability of the Pavlovian Go/No-Go Task for Computational Psychiatry Research.

Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Generation and characterization of a tamoxifen-inducible, Cre driver rat for transgene expression in microglia.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

This study clarifies prediction errors in neuroscience. It explains how discrepancies between expected and actual outcomes drive learning in neural circuits, highlighting the strengths and limitations of this research area.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Reinforcement learning concepts are increasingly influential in studying neural circuits.
  • Prediction errors, the discrepancies between expected and actual outcomes, are central to these computational models.
  • Neural signals related to prediction errors have been identified across multiple brain regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address common questions regarding prediction errors in neuroscience.
  • To elucidate the strengths and limitations of prediction error models in explaining neural and behavioral phenomena.
  • To foster a more comprehensive understanding of this rapidly advancing research field.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of existing literature on prediction errors in neuroscience.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Addressing ten fundamental questions to clarify key concepts.
  • Discussion of empirical evidence and theoretical implications.

    • Main Results:

    • Prediction error signals are observed in various brain areas, including the midbrain, striatum, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex.
    • These signals are crucial for learning and have been implicated in the shift from goal-directed to habitual behaviors.
    • The study identifies both the utility and boundaries of current prediction error frameworks.

    Conclusions:

    • Prediction error models offer a powerful framework for understanding learning and behavior in neural systems.
    • A clear understanding of the strengths and limitations is essential for future research directions.
    • Further investigation is needed to refine and expand upon the current models.