Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
General practitioners ignore high normal blood pressure
Adam Windak1, Barbara Gryglewska, Tomasz Tomasik
1Department of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland. mmwindak@cyf-kr.edu.pl
Insights
Polish primary care physicians often misdiagnose elevated blood pressure, particularly high normal blood pressure, especially in patients with diabetes. Physician age also significantly impacts diagnostic accuracy for blood pressure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- General Practice
- Public Health
Background:
- Accurate diagnosis of elevated blood pressure is crucial for cardiovascular risk management.
- Primary care physicians play a vital role in initial hypertension detection and management.
- Assessing diagnostic capabilities in primary care settings is essential for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Polish primary care physicians regarding elevated blood pressure.
- To determine how cardiovascular risk factors, including diabetes mellitus, influence blood pressure diagnosis.
- To investigate the correlation between physician age and diagnostic errors in blood pressure assessment.
Main Methods:
- A survey was conducted using a questionnaire with eight distinct clinical cases.
- The cases varied in blood pressure levels (high normal vs. grade 2 hypertension), presence of risk factors, and diabetes mellitus status.
- A stratified sample of primary health care physicians in Poland participated, achieving a 65% response rate.
Main Results:
- Overall correct diagnosis of blood pressure levels was achieved in only 54.8% of responses.
- Incorrect diagnosis rates for high normal blood pressure were high, ranging from 64.0% to 84.0%, significantly increasing with diabetes.
- Grade 2 hypertension was diagnosed incorrectly in 8.8% to 20.8% of cases.
- Older physicians demonstrated a higher frequency of diagnostic errors (r = 0.38, p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- A significant proportion of Polish primary care physicians struggle to correctly diagnose elevated blood pressure, particularly high normal levels.
- The presence of diabetes mellitus substantially increases the likelihood of misdiagnosing high normal blood pressure.
- Physician age is a significant factor associated with diagnostic inaccuracies in blood pressure assessment.
Abstract:
The objective of the study was to assess the ability of Polish primary care physicians to diagnose elevated blood pressure in cases with different cardiovascular risks. A questionnaire, containing eight written cases differing in relation to three major variables, was developed to conduct a survey in a stratified sample of primary health care physicians in Poland. The variables were: (i) levels of blood pressure (high normal (HN) or grade 2 hypertension (HT2); (ii) coexistence of selected risk factors (RF+/-) and (iii) diabetes mellitus (DM+/-). The response rate was 65% (125/192 selected physicians). The correct diagnosis of blood pressure (BP) level was confirmed in 54.8% of answers. The percentages of incorrectly diagnosed cases with HN BP were, respectively, 64.0% (RF-, DM-), 77.6% (RF+, DM-), 80.0% (RF+, DM+) and 84.0% (RF-, DM+). In the cases with HT2, the incorrect diagnosis ranged from 8.8% (RF+, DM-) to 20.8% (RF-, DM-). In subgroup analysis of four cases with different levels of BP, the appearance of DM significantly increased the levels of incorrect diagnosis of cases with HN BP (p<0.001). Older physicians would make an incorrect diagnosis significantly more often (r = 0.38, p<0.001). Most primary care physicians would ignore HN BP, even in diabetic patients. The age of the physician is a significant factor contributing to incorrect diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies