Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: January 29, 2016
Determining meaningful changes in hip abductor muscle strength obtained by handheld dynamometry
James W Youdas1, Sara T Mraz, Barbara J Norstad
1Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. youdas.james@mayo.edu
This study determined the minimal detectable change (MDC) for isometric hip abductor strength using a handheld dynamometer. The MDC ensures strength changes are significant and not due to measurement error.
Area of Science:
- Kinesiology
- Biomechanics
- Musculoskeletal Health
Background:
- Assessing isometric hip abductor muscle strength is crucial for evaluating lower limb function.
- Handheld dynamometers (HHDs) are commonly used for muscle strength testing.
- Quantifying measurement error, such as minimal detectable change (MDC), is essential for reliable strength assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the minimal detectable change (MDC) for isometric hip abductor muscle strength in healthy adults using a handheld dynamometer (HHD).
- To establish a threshold for determining a true change in hip abductor strength beyond measurement error.
Main Methods:
- Ninety healthy volunteers (45 males, 45 females) aged 22-70 years participated.
- Isometric hip abductor force was measured bilaterally using a digital HHD in a supine position.
- Measurements were normalized to body weight (BW); intratester reliability was assessed using ICC(3,1).
Main Results:
- High intratester reliability was found with an ICC(3,1) of 0.96.
- The standard error of measurement (SEM) was 2 Newtons.
- The MDC(95) was determined to be 5.4% BW for males and 5.3% BW for females.
Conclusions:
- The MDC(95) provides a reliable threshold to differentiate true changes in isometric hip abductor strength from measurement variability.
- These findings are valuable for clinicians and researchers using HHDs to monitor hip abductor strength.
- Changes in strength below the MDC(95) should be interpreted as within the margin of error.
More Related Videos
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
07:30Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018