Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the strength of the linear...
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects or...
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity, and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Open and sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

OMAnnotator: a novel approach to building an annotated consensus genome sequence.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

The missing link in FAIR data policy: biodata resources in life sciences.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Quest for Orthologs in the era of Data Deluge and AI: Challenges and Innovations in Orthology Prediction and Data Integration.

Journal of molecular evolution·2025
Same author

Structural phylogenetics unravels the evolutionary diversification of communication systems in gram-positive bacteria and their viruses.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Covariance of maximum likelihood evolutionary distances between sequences aligned pairwise.

Christophe Dessimoz1, Manuel Gil

  • 1Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland. cdessimoz@inf.ethz.ch

BMC Evolutionary Biology
|June 25, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new covariance estimator for biological sequence distances, crucial for large-scale evolutionary analyses. The method performs reliably, improving phylogenetic tree building and other comparative analyses.

More Related Videos

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma
15:07

VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma

Published on: December 28, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma
15:07

VDJ-Seq: Deep Sequencing Analysis of Rearranged Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene to Reveal Clonal Evolution Patterns of B Cell Lymphoma

Published on: December 28, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Evolution
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Estimating distances between biological sequences is vital in molecular evolution.
  • Maximum Likelihood (ML) is commonly used, but covariance estimators for independently aligned pairs are lacking.
  • Current methods are computationally expensive for large-scale analyses requiring repeated Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSAs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel estimator for the covariance of distances derived from pairwise sequence alignments.
  • To address the need for efficient covariance estimation in large-scale analyses where MSAs are prohibitive.
  • To enhance processes like phylogenetic tree building and orthology inference.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a new estimator for the covariance of pairwise sequence distances.
  • Conducted extensive Monte Carlo simulations to analyze the estimator's performance.
  • Compared the new estimator against the established ML distance variance estimator.

Main Results:

  • The introduced covariance estimator demonstrates performance comparable to the ML variance estimator.
  • The estimator shows no significant bias for sequence divergences below 150 PAM units (~29% sequence identity).
  • Covariances may be underestimated at higher divergence levels, mirroring ML variance underestimation.

Conclusions:

  • The new covariance estimator is a valuable tool for molecular evolution studies.
  • It integrates effectively with ML variance estimators to construct covariance matrices.
  • The estimator provides reliable results for a significant range of sequence divergences.