Arousal, working memory, and conscious awareness in contingency learning
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Investigating the Neural Mechanisms of Aware and Unaware Fear Memory with fMRI
Published on: October 6, 2011
Louise D Cosand1, Thomas M Cavanagh, Ashley A Brown
1Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, 3620 McClintock Avenue, SGM 501, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA. cosand@usc.edu
Abstract:
There are wide individual differences in the ability to detect a stimulus contingency embedded in a complex paradigm. The present study used a cognitive masking paradigm to better understand individual differences related to contingency learning. Participants were assessed on measures of electrodermal arousal and on working memory capacity before engaging in the contingency learning task. Contingency awareness was assessed both by trial-by-trial verbal reports obtained during the task and by a short post-task recognition questionnaire. Participants who became aware had fewer non-specific skin conductance responses and tended to score higher on a digit span assessment. Skin conductance level was not significantly lower in the aware group than in the unaware group. These findings are consistent with studies showing that lower arousal and greater cognitive processing capacity facilitate conscious perception of a greater breadth of information within a scene or a task.
Related Concept Videos
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Understanding Consciousness
Sleep, a crucial state, is characterized by reduced physical...
Optimal Arousal Theory
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Subconsciousness and No Awareness
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory
Working Memory

