Criteria for the evaluation of large cohort studies: an application to the nurses' health study
Related Experiment Videos
Graham A Colditz1, Deborah M Winn
1School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA. colditzg@wustl.edu
Abstract:
Evaluating the success of major funding programs from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) remains a vexing challenge. We propose a set of criteria to evaluate epidemiological studies that fit within the discovery, development, and delivery paradigm introduced by the NIH. We apply these criteria to the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), a large epidemiological cohort study initiated in the 1970s to evaluate the associations between oral contraceptives and risk of breast cancer and between diet and other lifestyle factors and risk of cancer overall. Our evaluation suggests that the NHS has led to important changes in health practice, and it underscores the need to develop metrics that are suitable to the evaluation of large epidemiological cohort studies.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Introduction to Epidemiology
Longitudinal Research