Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation?

Susannah K Revkin1, Manuela Piazza, Véronique Izard

  • 1INSERM, U562, Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Gif/Yvette, France. susannahrevkin@gmail.com

Psychological Science
|June 27, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gaze dynamics of cued speech perception.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Psychotic subtitles: A case of transient ticker-tape synesthesia.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Pathways for learning arithmetic: Distinct dynamics for associative and procedural acquisition.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Brain Activity During Repetitive Cognitive Load in Young Adults: a Pilot Study.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Bridging speech and sight: white matter anatomy in ticker-tape synaesthesia.

Brain communications·2025
Same author

Seeing speech: Neural mechanisms of cued speech perception in prelingually deaf and hearing users.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Motive Alignment Promotes Adolescents' Proenvironmental Behavior: A Field Experiment in Two Cultures.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Subitizing, the quick counting of small groups, likely uses a unique brain process, not general estimation. This study found number perception differs for small versus large quantities, supporting a dedicated mechanism for small numbers.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Subitizing is the rapid enumeration of small visual sets (typically 1-4 items).
  • The cognitive mechanisms underlying subitizing are debated, with hypotheses including general numerical estimation or a dedicated process.
  • Weber's law in numerical estimation predicts consistent precision across quantities, which is challenged by subitizing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether a single numerical estimation system underlies both subitizing (small quantities) and larger quantity estimation.
  • To test if Weber's law applies uniformly across small (1-8) and large (10-80) numerosities.

Main Methods:

  • A masked forced-choice paradigm was employed with adult participants.
  • Participants identified the numerosity of visual displays within two ranges: 1-8 items and 10-80 items.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli sets were matched for discrimination difficulty to isolate numerosity effects.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant violation of Weber's law was observed.
    • Perceptual precision was substantially higher for small numerosities (1-4) compared to larger ones (10-40).
    • This precision difference refutes the hypothesis of a unified estimation system.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support the existence of a distinct cognitive mechanism specifically for processing small numerosities (subitizing).
    • A shared estimation system for both small and large quantities is unlikely.
    • Subitizing appears to rely on a dedicated process rather than general numerical estimation principles.