Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...

Weighted Mean

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Feasibility of Early Enteral Nutrition in Patients Under Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Acute medicine & surgery·2026

Same author

Serum Amyloid β Oligomer May Predict Treatment Response in Middle-Aged and Late-Life Patients With Depression.

Neuropsychopharmacology reports·2026

Same author

Hemorrhagic shock and encephalopathy syndrome with hyper-inflammation and elevation of IL-6 and GDF-15 following COVID-19: A case report.

IDCases·2025

Same author

Fecal microbiota transplantation for Crohn's disease-like intestinal lesions arising after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

International journal of hematology·2025

Same author

Lung microbiota of patients with ARDS due to coronavirus disease 2019 receiving ECMO.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Longitudinal MRI study over 20 years of cervical posterior extensor muscle area in asymptomatic subjects.

Scientific reports·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

A weighted average difference method for detecting differentially expressed genes from microarray data.

Koji Kadota¹, Yuji Nakai, Kentaro Shimizu

¹Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan. kadota@bi.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Algorithms for Molecular Biology : AMB

|June 27, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new method called weighted average difference (WAD) effectively ranks differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in microarray studies. WAD offers improved sensitivity and specificity, enhancing confidence in gene expression analysis.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Published on: October 3, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization

Published on: October 3, 2025

Area of Science:

Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Genomics

Background:

Identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) is crucial for microarray studies.
Selecting appropriate DEG identification methods and preprocessing algorithms (e.g., MAS, RMA, DFW) is challenging due to performance variations.
Optimizing DEG detection requires a suitable combination of gene selection and preprocessing for specific datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

Introduce a novel fold-change (FC)-based method, the weighted average difference (WAD) method, for ranking DEGs.
Evaluate WAD's performance against seven other DEG ranking methods using diverse datasets.
Assess the consistency of WAD's gene ranking across different preprocessing algorithms.

Main Methods:

Developed the weighted average difference (WAD) method, utilizing average difference and relative average signal intensity.
Compared WAD with seven established methods: AD, FC, RP, modT, samT, shrinkT, and ibmT.
Evaluated methods on 38 binary probe-level datasets, including artificial and real experimental data.

Main Results:

WAD demonstrated superior performance in simultaneously balancing sensitivity and specificity, evidenced by the highest average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
WAD exhibited the most consistent gene ranking across MAS, RMA, and DFW preprocessing methods.
FC-based methods, including WAD, performed well on RMA and DFW preprocessed data, while WAD excelled with MAS data.

Conclusions:

The weighted average difference (WAD) method is a robust alternative for ranking DEGs in two-class microarray analyses.
WAD's high performance can bolster researchers' confidence in the reliability of microarray data analysis.
The choice of preprocessing algorithm impacts the performance of DEG ranking methods, with WAD showing particular strength with MAS data.