Counting cases in substitope algorithms
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
David C Banks1, Stephen A Linton, Paul K Stockmeyer
1Department of Computer Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. banks@csit.fsu.edu
Abstract:
We describe how to count the cases that arise in a family of visualization techniques, including Marching Cubes, Sweeping Simplices, Contour Meshing, Interval Volumes, and Separating Surfaces. Counting the cases is the first step toward developing a generic visualization algorithm to produce substitopes (geometric substitutions of polytopes). We demonstrate the method using "GAP," a software system for computational group theory. The case-counts are organized into a table that provides a taxonomy of members of the family; numbers in the table are derived from actual lists of cases, which are computed by our methods. The calculations confirm previously reported case-counts for four dimensions that are too large to check by hand and predict the number of cases that will arise in substitope algorithms that have not yet been invented. We show how Pólya theory produces a closed-form upper bound on the case counts.
Related Concept Videos
Rationalizing Substitutions
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Substitution Rule Applied to Definite Integrals
Mathematical Induction
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Evaluating Limits by Direct Substitution
