Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

07:52
Detection of Antibodies That Neutralize the Cellular Uptake of Enzyme Replacement Therapies with a Cell-based Assay
Published on: September 10, 2018
Testing for recombinant human erythropoietin in urine: problems associated with current anti-doping testing
Carsten Lundby1, Niels J Achman-Andersen, Jonas J Thomsen
1Copenhagen Muscle Research Centre, Rigshospitalet section 7652, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. lundby@idraet.au.dk
Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
|June 28, 2008
Summary
The detection of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) misuse in athletes shows significant variability between World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-accredited labs. Detection power is minimal after the initial boosting phase, raising concerns about anti-doping effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biochemistry
- Anti-Doping Analytics
Background:
- Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) enhances blood oxygen capacity, leading to potential misuse by athletes.
- World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-accredited laboratories test athlete urine samples for rHuEpo misuse.
- Existing rHuEpo detection methods face critiques regarding their effectiveness and consistency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the detection power of rHuEpo testing in athlete urine samples.
- To compare the variability in detection power between two WADA-accredited laboratories.
- To assess the efficacy of rHuEpo detection during different administration phases (boosting, maintenance, post-administration).
Main Methods:
- Eight human subjects were administered rHuEpo over a 4-week period, including boosting, maintenance, and a 3-week post-period.
- Urine samples were collected throughout the 7-week study duration.
- Samples were analyzed by two different WADA-accredited laboratories to compare results.
Main Results:
- Laboratory A detected rHuEpo misuse in all subjects during the boosting period.
- Laboratory B reported no misuse, with one negative and seven suspicious samples during the boosting period.
- Detection rates significantly decreased in maintenance and post-periods, with minimal positive or suspicious findings from either lab.
Conclusions:
- There is poor agreement in rHuEpo test results between the two WADA-accredited laboratories studied.
- The power to detect rHuEpo misuse is minimal during the maintenance and post-administration periods.
- Current anti-doping testing for rHuEpo may be insufficient to detect misuse effectively outside the initial administration phase.

