Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

CT colonography and cost-effectiveness.

Ifigeneia Mavranezouli1, James E East, Stuart A Taylor

  • 1National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Sub-department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

European Radiology
|June 28, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The CONTEXT trial: Real world clinical use of GIQuant-a motility MRI based activity biomarker for small bowel Crohn's disease.

Journal of Crohn's & colitis·2026
Same author

Invited Commentary: Imaging in Crohn Disease Is Evolving: Why Clinician-Radiologist Collaboration Has Never Been More Important.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same author

Intestinal ultrasound to detect postoperative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease: an international, multidisciplinary, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method study.

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same author

Efficacy and acceptability of bowel preparation strategies for inflammatory bowel disease colonoscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endoscopy international open·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence-supported polyp detection (CADe) at colonoscopy reduces the detection of high grade dysplasia and invasive cancer.

Endoscopy·2026
Same author

Evaluating treatment to a target of transmural healing in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: rationale, design and protocol for the randomised controlled VECTORS trial.

BMJ open gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: pelvic floor imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

STIR or T2-Dixon? A false dilemma in musculoskeletal MRI.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive quantification for more reproducible amyloid PET interpretation.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Temporal bone remodeling after venous stenting for pulsatile tinnitus: isolated dehiscence versus diverticulum.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

CT colonography (CTC) is a potential colorectal cancer screening tool. However, its cost-effectiveness is questionable compared to colonoscopy, depending heavily on factors like costs and compliance.

Area of Science:

  • Medical screening
  • Health economics
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is crucial for early detection and improved patient outcomes.
  • CT colonography (CTC) is emerging as a potential non-invasive screening alternative.
  • Policy-makers increasingly focus on the cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and analyze the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography (CTC) as a colorectal cancer screening method.
  • To identify key parameters influencing the economic viability of CTC.
  • To compare the cost-effectiveness of CTC with colonoscopy.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of published cost-effectiveness studies on CTC.
  • Analysis of factors influencing CTC cost-effectiveness, including intervention costs, compliance rates, and colonoscopy effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of the prevalence and natural history of diminutive advanced polyps.

    • Main Results:

    • Most studies suggest CTC is not cost-effective when colonoscopy is a viable option.
    • The cost-effectiveness conclusion is highly sensitive to specific parameters.
    • Key influencing factors include intervention costs, patient compliance, colonoscopy efficacy, and polyp characteristics.

    Conclusions:

    • CTC's role as a cost-effective colorectal cancer screening tool is uncertain, particularly when colonoscopy is available.
    • Further research is needed to clarify the impact of specific parameters on CTC's economic value.
    • Optimizing CTC implementation requires careful consideration of its cost-effectiveness relative to established methods like colonoscopy.