Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

Overview
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins02:26

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain.  Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Protein and Protein Structures02:15

Protein and Protein Structures

Proteins are one of the most abundant organic molecules in living systems and have the most diverse range of functions of all macromolecules. Proteins may be structural, regulatory, contractile, or protective. They may serve in transport, storage, or membranes; or they may be toxins or enzymes. Their structures, like their functions, vary greatly. They are all, however, amino acid polymers arranged in a linear sequence.
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme can...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Addressing the challenge of post-approval regulation of pharmaceuticals: The case for independent third-party evaluations.

Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Evaluating Frailty Index Integrity: Insights from an International Network Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Mental health risks in children with food allergies: a population-based comparison of food allergies with other chronic conditions.

European journal of pediatrics·2025
Same author

SNOMED CT entity linking challenge.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Pan-cancer multi-omic model of LINE-1 activity reveals locus heterogeneity of retrotransposition efficiency.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Pan-cancer multi-omic model of LINE-1 activity reveals locus heterogeneity of retrotransposition efficiency.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Probabilistic RNA designability via interpretable ensemble approximation and dynamic decomposition.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Quantifying domain-specific relevance of computational biology Wikipedia articles using TF-IDF and cosine similarity.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

GATSBI: improving context-aware protein embeddings through biologically motivated data splits.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

BiMba: using Vision Mamba to predict protein sites that bind other proteins.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

ProMeta: a meta-learning framework for robust disease diagnosis and prediction from plasma proteomics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Is a Win-Win possible? Achieving pareto-optimal privacy-utility balance in fine-tuned genome language model embeddings against embedding reconstruction attacks.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

A computational framework to empower probabilistic protein design.

Menachem Fromer1, Chen Yanover

  • 1School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. fromer@cs.huji.ac.il

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|July 1, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a computational framework for probabilistic protein design using belief propagation (BP). While BP improves sequence generation over prior methods, it reveals limitations in the current structural paradigm for predicting functional proteins.

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Protein engineering
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Protein design aims to engineer proteins for specific biological functions.
  • Probabilistic protein design uses amino acid probabilities to generate sequence libraries for screening.
  • Optimizing these probability distributions is computationally challenging due to the exponential number of sequences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computational framework for probabilistic protein design based on a structural paradigm.
  • To apply belief propagation (BP) for calculating amino acid probabilities within this framework.
  • To assess the accuracy and limitations of the structural paradigm using experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Formulated sequence distribution using the Boltzmann distribution over free energies.
  • Constructed a probabilistic graphical model.
  • Applied belief propagation (BP) for calculating marginal amino acid probabilities.
  • Validated against a large structural dataset and experimental data.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the superiority of BP over previous methods on a large structural dataset.
  • Showed that BP yields results identical to exact inference on small sub-problems.
  • Quantitative analysis revealed significant discrepancies between predicted and experimental amino acid distributions.
  • Identified potential shortcomings of the fixed-backbone structural paradigm.

Conclusions:

  • The developed BP framework offers an improvement for probabilistic protein design.
  • The study highlights limitations of the current structural paradigm, suggesting a need for refinement.
  • Future work should focus on improving the protein design paradigm based on these findings.