Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
The R Chart01:02

The R Chart

In statistical process control, control charts, particularly R charts, are instrumental in monitoring process variations and identifying non-random patterns that run charts might miss. R charts track the variability within process subgroups, which is crucial when standard deviation use is impractical or unknown process variations exist.
R charts are pivotal for pinpointing shifts in process variability. Stability is indicated when all data points remain within the defined upper and lower...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Statement on the use and interpretation of the margin of exposure approach.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2025
Same author

Contributions of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives to international food safety: celebrating the 100th meeting of the committee.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025
Same author

Risks to human and animal health from the presence of bromide in food and feed.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2025
Same author

Risk assessment of complex organoarsenic species in food.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2024
Same author

Update of the risk assessment of brominated phenols and their derivatives in food.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2024
Same author

Re-evaluation of silicon dioxide (E 551) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and follow-up of its re-evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Risk--what is it?

Diane Benford1

  • 1Food Standards Agency, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London WC2B 6NH, UK. diane.benford@foodstandards.gsi.gov.uk

Toxicology Letters
|July 2, 2008
PubMed
Summary

This article clarifies the definition of risk, emphasizing expert judgment of evidence for adverse effects. It highlights challenges in human risk assessment, including exposure limitations and causal attribution.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • The World Health Organization International Program on Chemical Safety defines risk as the probability of adverse effects from exposure to an agent.
  • Accurate risk determination relies on synthesizing evidence from diverse experimental and observational studies.
  • Assessing human risk is complex, often necessitating extrapolation from animal studies due to feasibility constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate key components of the established definition of risk.
  • To discuss the methodologies and challenges in determining chemical risk to human populations.
  • To explore the practical application of risk assessment, comparing exposure estimates with health-based guidance values.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the definition of risk and its constituent elements.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

  • Analysis of evidence sources for hazard identification and risk characterization.
  • Discussion of epidemiological study limitations and exposure assessment challenges.

    • Main Results:

    • Risk assessment integrates expert judgment with a comprehensive body of evidence.
    • Human risk assessment faces inherent difficulties, including inferring causality and quantifying exposure.
    • Comparing exposure levels to health-based guidance values is a common risk management approach.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the multifaceted nature of risk is crucial for effective chemical safety evaluation.
    • Addressing limitations in human exposure assessment and causal inference is vital for robust risk management.
    • The practical application of risk assessment involves comparing exposure data with established health benchmarks.