Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

The two-compartment model divides the body into central and peripheral compartments to account for varying blood perfusion rates among organs and tissues, affecting drug distribution. The central compartment includes blood and highly perfused tissues with rapid drug distribution, while the peripheral compartment contains tissues with slower drug distribution. After a single IV bolus dose, the drug concentration is high in plasma and low in tissues. The drug distribution between compartments...

Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model

Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model

The single-compartment model serves as a simplified representation of the human body. This model assumes that the body functions as a single, well-mixed open compartment. When a drug is administered intravenously, it enters the body and quickly distributes uniformly. The drug then undergoes biotransformation and elimination, ultimately leaving the body. The volume of this compartment is referred to as the apparent volume of distribution into which the drug can uniformly distribute. In this...

Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Infusion

Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Infusion

A two-compartment model is a vital tool in pharmacokinetics, providing an essential understanding of drug behavior, especially for those administered via zero-order intravenous infusion. This model outlines two compartments: the central compartment, where elimination occurs, and the peripheral compartment.
The model illustrates the decrease in plasma drug concentration from the central compartment with a specific equation. It shows that under steady-state conditions, the drug's input rate...

Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration

Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration

The two-compartment model for extravascular administration represents a drug's absorption and distribution process. It features a central compartment, where the drug is first absorbed, and a peripheral compartment, which illustrates the drug's distribution throughout the body. The rate of change in drug concentration in the central compartment is calculated by three exponents: absorption, distribution, and elimination.
The absorption exponent (ka) indicates the speed at which the drug is...

Three-Compartment Open Model

Three-Compartment Open Model

The three-compartment open model is a pharmacokinetic model used to describe the distribution and elimination of drugs following extravascular administration. It comprises a central compartment representing the plasma and two peripheral compartments. The highly perfused peripheral compartment represents organs and tissues with a rich blood supply, such as the liver, kidneys, and lungs. The scarcely perfused peripheral compartment represents tissues with lower blood supply, such as adipose...

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

Physiological pharmacokinetic models, often called flow-limited or perfusion models, typically assume a swift drug distribution between tissue and venous blood, creating a rapid drug equilibrium. This premise is based on the idea that drug diffusion is extremely fast, and the cell membrane presents no barrier to drug permeation. In this scenario, where no drug binding occurs, the drug concentration in the tissue equals that of the venous blood leaving the tissue. This greatly simplifies the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mouth breathing, another risk factor for asthma: the Nagahama Study.

Allergy·2016

Same author

Fourth step for ultrasound-guided central vein catheterization.

British journal of anaesthesia·2013

Same author

Fucosylated TGF-β receptors transduces a signal for epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer cells.

British journal of cancer·2013

Same author

Stromal cells expressing hedgehog-interacting protein regulate the proliferation of myeloid neoplasms.

Blood cancer journal·2012

Same author

Influence of medial meniscectomy on stress distribution of the femoral cartilage in porcine knees: a 3D reconstructed T2 mapping study.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2012

Same author

Ex vivo imaging of mouse brain using micro-CT with non-ionic iodinated contrast agent: a comparison with myelin staining.

The British journal of radiology·2012

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Visualization and Analysis of Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in Hepatic Microcirculation: Application to an Acute Hepatitis Model

Visualization and Analysis of Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in Hepatic Microcirculation: Application to an Acute Hepatitis Model

Published on: August 4, 2012

A quantitative method for estimating hepatic blood flow using a dual-input single-compartment model.

S Miyazaki¹, K Murase, T Yoshikawa

¹Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Faculty of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

The British Journal of Radiology

|July 2, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study developed a new quantitative method to accurately measure arterial and portal hepatic blood flow separately. The new method, using a dual-input single-compartment model, corrects for transit time, improving accuracy over the maximum slope method.

More Related Videos

Imaging and Quantification of the Hepatic Vasculature of Mice Using Ultrafast Doppler Ultrasound

Imaging and Quantification of the Hepatic Vasculature of Mice Using Ultrafast Doppler Ultrasound

Published on: July 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Visualization and Analysis of Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in Hepatic Microcirculation: Application to an Acute Hepatitis Model

Visualization and Analysis of Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption in Hepatic Microcirculation: Application to an Acute Hepatitis Model

Published on: August 4, 2012

Imaging and Quantification of the Hepatic Vasculature of Mice Using Ultrafast Doppler Ultrasound

Imaging and Quantification of the Hepatic Vasculature of Mice Using Ultrafast Doppler Ultrasound

Published on: July 19, 2024

Area of Science:

Medical Imaging
Hepatology
Quantitative Analysis

Background:

Accurate assessment of hepatic blood flow is crucial for diagnosing and managing liver diseases.
Existing methods, like the maximum slope method, may not precisely differentiate between arterial and portal contributions.
Quantitative analysis using compartmental models offers a potential improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate a dual-input single-compartment model for accurately estimating arterial hepatic blood flow (K(1a)) and portal hepatic blood flow (K(1p)) separately.
To compare this quantitative method against the maximum slope method using both computer simulations and clinical data.
To investigate the impact of contrast agent transit times (tau(a), tau(p)) on flow estimations.

Main Methods:

Computer simulations were performed to model time-density curves and estimate rate constants (K(1a), K(1p), k(2)) using the linear least-squares (LLSQ) method.
Dynamic CT data from 27 patients were analyzed pixel by pixel to generate parametric maps of K(1a), K(1p), and k(2) via the LLSQ method.
The LLSQ method's accuracy was compared with the maximum slope method under varying transit time conditions.

Main Results:

Simulation studies indicated that arterial transit time (tau(a)) significantly affects K(1a) estimation, while portal transit time (tau(p)) has a smaller effect on K(1p).
Clinical data showed the maximum slope method underestimated K(1a) by 60% ± 29% and K(1p) by 37% ± 12% compared to the LLSQ method.
The LLSQ method successfully generated pixel-by-pixel parametric maps of hepatic blood flow components.

Conclusions:

Correction for arterial transit time (tau(a)) is essential for accurate estimation of K(1a) and K(1p).
The proposed dual-input single-compartment model demonstrates promise for precise, separate evaluation of arterial and portal hepatic blood flow.
This quantitative method offers a valuable tool for assessing hepatic blood flow in various liver conditions.