Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can program evaluation be saved from its enthusiasts?

J Zusman

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |November 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Program evaluation, using scientific methods to assess agency work, is popular but rarely impacts operations. Unrealistic expectations can lead to disappointment, so evaluations should be selective and impactful.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Reaction.

    The journal of primary prevention·2013
    Same author

    Addendum to debate statement.

    The journal of primary prevention·2013
    Same author

    "No-therapy": A method of helping persons with problems.

    Community mental health journal·2013
    Same author

    Ways to address medical errors.

    Health affairs (Project Hope)·2001
    Same author

    A study of thiotepa, etoposide and fractionated total body irradiation as a preparative regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation for poor prognosis patients with neuroblastoma.

    Bone marrow transplantation·1996
    Same author

    JCAHO still the best option.

    Modern healthcare·1994
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: President-Elect Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: CEO and Medical Director's Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Reports to the Membership.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Convergent Metabolic Dysregulations But Divergent Contributing Pathways Across Severe Mental Disorders: The Power of Combining Genetics and Metabolomics.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    2026 Annual Meeting: Presidential Address.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Represcribing Previously Used Antipsychotics: Response to So.

    The American journal of psychiatry·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Program Evaluation Methodologies
    • Mental Health Administration

    Background:

    • Program evaluation, employing scientific techniques to measure agency work value, has gained significant traction in mental health service planning.
    • Despite enthusiasm, there's a notable scarcity of completed program evaluation studies.
    • Existing studies show limited evidence of substantial impact on program or agency operations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically assess the current state and practical impact of program evaluation in mental health services.
    • To address the gap between the enthusiasm for program evaluation and its demonstrated effectiveness.
    • To provide recommendations for the judicious application of program evaluation.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of existing program evaluation studies in mental health.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the reported outcomes and impacts of conducted evaluations.
  • Conceptual analysis of the relationship between evaluation enthusiasm and practical application.
  • Main Results:

    • Few program evaluation studies have been completed in the mental health sector.
    • Evidence of significant impact from program evaluations on agency operations is lacking.
    • Overenthusiasm for program evaluation can lead to disillusionment when results do not meet inflated expectations.

    Conclusions:

    • Program evaluation should be implemented selectively in mental health services.
    • Application of program evaluation should be reserved for cases where demonstrable impact is feasible.
    • A more realistic and targeted approach to program evaluation is necessary for effective mental health service improvement.