Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
The reliability of lie detection performance
Amy-May Leach1, R C L Lindsay, Rachel Koehler
1Faculty of Criminology, Justice, and Policy Studies, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada, L1H 7K4. amy.leach@uoit.ca
Abstract:
We examined whether individuals' ability to detect deception remained stable over time. In two sessions, held one week apart, university students viewed video clips of individuals and attempted to differentiate between the lie-tellers and truth-tellers. Overall, participants had difficulty detecting all types of deception. When viewing children answering yes-no questions about a transgression (Experiments 1 and 5), participants' performance was highly reliable. However, rating adults who provided truthful or fabricated accounts did not produce a significant alternate forms correlation (Experiment 2). This lack of reliability was not due to the types of deceivers (i.e., children versus adults) or interviews (i.e., closed-ended questions versus extended accounts) (Experiment 3). Finally, the type of deceptive scenario (naturalistic vs. experimentally-manipulated) could not account for differences in reliability (Experiment 4). Theoretical and legal implications are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Reliability and Validity
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

