Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical trials in stroke prevention.

H J Barnett1

  • 1John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

Arzneimittel-Forschung
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomized clinical trials are essential for evaluating stroke prevention treatments. Anticoagulants and aspirin are proven effective for specific conditions, while other treatments require further evaluation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

1. Design and main results of the trial.

Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
Same author

Surgery was beneficial for severe carotid stenosis in patients with symptomatic carotid ischemia.

Evidence-based cardiovascular medicine·2005
Same author

Carotid angioplasty/stenting versus endarterectomy.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2001
Same author

Thrombolysis must be considered after stroke.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2001
Same author

Prognosis after transient monocular blindness associated with carotid-artery stenosis.

The New England journal of medicine·2001
Same author

Stroke: 30 years of progress: 1982-1987.

Stroke·2001

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating stroke prevention and treatment strategies.
  • Non-randomized comparisons and data banks have limitations in assessing treatment efficacy for stroke patients.
  • Over 35 years, RCT methodologies have improved, enhancing reliability in stroke research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of various treatments for preventing ischemic stroke.
  • To assess the role of anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and surgical interventions in stroke prevention.
  • To establish benchmarks for judging the efficacy of stroke treatments.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing randomized clinical trials on stroke prevention.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data from trials evaluating anticoagulants, acetylsalicylic acid, ticlopidine, and other agents.
  • Evaluation of surgical interventions like cerebral by-pass and carotid endarterectomy.
  • Main Results:

    • Anticoagulants are effective for stroke prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation and post-myocardial infarction.
    • Acetylsalicylic acid (325-1300 mg/d) is proven effective for stroke prevention; lower doses lack evidence.
    • Ticlopidine demonstrates efficacy; dipyridamole, suloctidil, and sulfinpyrazone benefits are unproven. Cerebral by-pass surgery is not effective for arteriosclerotic cerebrovascular disease.
    • Carotid endarterectomy efficacy is still under evaluation.

    Conclusions:

    • RCTs are indispensable for stroke prevention and treatment evaluation.
    • Established treatments include anticoagulants for specific conditions and higher-dose aspirin.
    • Further research is needed for other pharmacological and surgical interventions in stroke prevention.