Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Challenging Opinion 83
1DSMZ - Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Inhoffenstrasse 7B, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany. bti@dsmz.de
Abstract:
The Judicial Commission has ruled that subgenus names within the genus Moraxella should be considered to have been included on the Approved Lists, together with the corresponding species names within these subgenera. Closer examination of the facts, including the wording of the relevant passages in the Code and the original publication in which these names are included, together with information that has subsequently come to light, indicates that there is good cause to re-examine the facts on which this Opinion is based.
Insights
The Judicial Commission
Area of Science:
- Bacteriology and Taxonomy
- Microbial Nomenclature
Background:
- The Judicial Commission previously ruled on the inclusion of subgenus names within the genus Moraxella on the Approved Lists.
- This ruling encompassed corresponding species names within these subgenera.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-examine the basis of a prior Judicial Commission Opinion regarding Moraxella subgenus names.
- To reassess the inclusion of these names on the Approved Lists.
Main Methods:
- Detailed review of the Judicial Commission's ruling.
- Analysis of relevant passages within the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
- Examination of the original publication containing the Moraxella names.
- Consideration of newly available information.
Main Results:
- New evidence suggests the need for a re-evaluation of the initial ruling.
- The interpretation of the Code and original publications may require further scrutiny.
Conclusions:
- There is sufficient cause to revisit the facts underpinning the Judicial Commission's Opinion.
- The taxonomic status of Moraxella subgenus names requires further investigation.
Related Concept Videos
Groupthink
Critical Thinking II
Critical Thinking I
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
