Ionicity in disordered GeSe2: a comparison of first-principles and atomistic potential models
Mark Wilson1, Bevan K Sharma, Carlo Massobrio
1Department of Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom. mark.wilson@chem.ox.ac.uk
Abstract:
The structural properties of liquid GeSe(2), generated using two distinct computational methodologies, are compared. The results of molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing both first-principles density functional and a potential model which account for aspects of many-body interactions, are considered. The potential model favors ionic character in the bonding, resulting in a structure with very little chemical disorder and no homopolar bonds, in contrast to experimental observation. The use of a relatively simple potential model is shown to be useful in order to understand differences between the observed experimental structure and those obtained from the first-principles approach, the latter being affected by insufficient account of ionic character in the bonding. Both computational schemes are able to predict the appearance of the first sharp diffraction peak in the total neutron structure factor and in some of the partial structure factors as well as the concomitant presence of corner- and edge-sharing tetrahedral connections. For the potential model, this holds true provided the system temperatures are set to values high enough to allow for diffusion properties typical of a liquid. Structural properties obtained for the two sets of configurations are in closer agreement when the potential model is applied at very high temperatures.
More Related Videos
08:04Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
13:56Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations
Published on: October 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Valence Bond Theory
Valence Bond Theory
Lattice Energies of Ionic Crystals
